Načela oziroma predpisi na podlagi pravil spričo negotovosti – je to resnično pomembno?

Avtorji

  • Mirko Pečarič University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/15.3.459-478(2017)

Ključne besede:

predpis, kompleksnost, pristop na podlagi načel, elementi ocenjevanja, uteži

Povzetek

Javne uprave pripravljajo osnutke zakonov. Vselej nastajajo novosti, ki jih ni mogoče vnaprej zajeti v zakone. Ena izmed rešitev bi lahko bil pristop na podlagi načel na lokalni in državni ravni, ki spričo kompleksnosti daje najbolj bistvene kombinacije načel in pravil. V prispevku je predstavljena zmožnost merjenja načel in pravil: vzpostavlja »pravilo 1:47« oziroma razmerje med načeli in pravili in podaja model, ki zaobjema elemente ocenjevanja načel in pravil ter njihove uteži. S to metodo bi lahko odločevalci sprejeli odločitve brez potrebe po številnejših in podrobnejših, a neučinkovitih predpisih.

 

Biografija avtorja

  • Associate Professor

Literatura

Aristotle. (2004) Nicomachean Ethics (R. Crisp, Ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (Reprint edition) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press).
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2013) Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2 edition) (New York: Oxford University Press).
Braithwaite, J. (2002) Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, pp. 47-82.
Breyer, S. (1982) Regulation and Its Reform (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Craig, P. (2012) EU Administrative Law (Oxford: OUP).
Dennet, D. C. (2012) Pojasnjena zavest (Ljubljana: Krtina).
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press).
Douglas, M. (1994) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory (London; New York: Routledge).
Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously (Fifth Printing edition) (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Ehrlich, I., & Posner, R. A. (1974) An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), pp. 257–286.
Guggenheimer, H. W. (2008) Tractates Bava Qamma, Bava Mesi’a, and Bava Batra (Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter).
Hacking, I. (2001) An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Howard, R. A., & Abbas, A. E. (2015) Foundations of Decision Analysis (Boston: Pearson).
Nehl, H. P. (1999) Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing).
Nieto-Garrido, E., & Delgado, I. M. (2007) European Administrative Law in the Constitutional Treaty (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing).
O’Keeffe, D. & Bavasso, A. (2000) Judicial Review in European Union Law:Essays in Honour of Lord Slynn (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
Parisi, F., & Fon, V. (2008) The Economics of Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works (London: Penguin Books).
Posner, E. A. (1996) Law, Economics, and Inefficient Norms, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144(5), pp. 1697–1744.
Posner, E. A. (2009) Law and Social Norms (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Raiffa, H. (1994) The Prescriptive Orientation of Decision Making: A Synthesis of Decision Analysis, Behavioral Decision Making, and Game Theory, In: Ríos, S. (ed.) Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges (pp. 3–13) (Boston: Springer Science & Business Media).
Raitio, J. (2003) The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
Sally, D. (1995) Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992, Rationality and Society, 7(1), pp. 58–92.
Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Russo, E. J. (1994) A Pyramid of Decision Approaches, In: Ríos, S. (ed.) Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges (Boston: Springer Science & Business Media), pp. 53-78.
Schwartz, A. & Scott, R. (1995) The Political Economy of Private Legislatures, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, pp. 595–654.
Schwarze, J. (2013) Sources of European Administrative Law, In: Martin, S. (ed.) The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noël (Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media).
Simon, H. A. (1997) Administrative Behavior, 4th Edition (4 Sub edition) (New York: Free Press).
Slovic, P. (1987) Perception of Risk, Science, 236(4799), pp. 280–285.
Taleb, N. N. (2010) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable Fragility (New York: Random House Publishing Group).
Taleb, N. N., & Sandis, C. (2014) The Skin In The Game Heuristic for Protection Against Tail Events, Review of Behavioral Economics, (1), pp. 1–21.
Wilson, W. (1887) The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), pp. 197–222. doi: 10.2307/2139277.
Xenitidou, M. & Edmonds, B. (eds.) (2014) The Complexity of Social Norms (Heidelberg; New York: Springer).

Objavljeno

2017-06-28

Številka

Rubrika

Article