The Components of Islamic Civilization; A Lasting Heritage and Evolving Visions

Authors

  • Abdelaziz Benticha university of Oran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/caqzkg61

Keywords:

Qur’an; Sunnah; Islamic civilization; religion and worldly life; knowledge and ethics; sustainable development

Abstract

This study examines Islamic civilization and its fundamental principles through illustrative examples from the Qur’an and the Sunnah. It highlights the core values upon which this civilization is built—mercy, peace, knowledge, and progress—aiming to establish the best approach to balancing worldly pursuits with the mission of developing and sustaining the earth. Using a descriptive methodology, the study analyzes the pioneering role of Islamic civilization in comparison to other civilizations. It explores the foundational aspects of Islamic civilization, how its principles are reflected across different domains and stages of progress, and practical ways to implement these values in contemporary life. This ensures that Islam remains adaptable to emerging global challenges and modern developments.

References

Alidoosti, A., Yazdani, M., Fouladgar, M. and Basiri, M.H. (2012) Risk Assessment of Critical Asset Using Fuzzy Inference System, Risk Management, 14(1), pp. 77-91.

Andrew, E., Collins. (2015) Risk Governance and Development, Risk Governance, pp. 477-479. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9328-5_27(2015).

Becker H.A. (1997) Social Impact Assessment, London: UCL Press.

Beck H.A. (2001) Social Impact Assessment, European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), pp. 311-321.

Burdge R.J. (2003) The Practice of Social Impact Assessment—Background. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21 (2), pp. 84 –88.

Dietz, T. (1987) Theory and Method in Social Impact
Assessment, Sociological Inquiry, 57(1), pp. 54-69.

Esteves, A . M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012) Social Impact Assessment: the State of the Art, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), pp. 34-42.

Erkkila, T. (2007) Governance and Accountability: A Shift in Conceptualization, Public Administration Quarterly. 2(1), pp. 1-38.

Freudenburg, W. (1986) Social Impact Assessment, Annual Review of Sociology, 12, pp. 451-478.

Gao, J. (2009) Governing by Goals and Numbers: A Case Study in the Use of Performance Measurement to Build State Capacity in China. Public Administration and Development, 29(1), pp. 21-31.

He, B. (2011) Civic Engagement through Participatory Budgeting in China: Three Different Logics at Work. Public Administration and Development, 31(2), pp.122 –133.

He, B. (2006) Western Theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Chinese Practice of Complex Deliberative Governance in The Search for Deliberative Democracy China, Leib EJ. and He B. (Eds), pp. 133– 148. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ho, P., Edmonds, R.L. (2008) China’s Embedded Activism: Opportunities and Constraints of A Social Movement. In: Routledge Studies on China in Transition, vol. 30. London, Routledge.

Kim, P.S. (2010) Building Trust by Improving Governance: Searching for A Feasible Way for Developing Countries. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 271-299.

Lawshe, C.H. (1975) A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity, Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp. 563-575.

Liu, Z.Z., Wang H.J., Huang J. (2013) Social Stability Assessment Based on Perspective of Policy Implementation. Journal of Northeast University (Social Science Edition),15 (6), pp. 606-612. (In Chinese)

Nye J.S. and Donahue. J. (2000) Governance in Globalizing World, Brook Institution: Washington,

O'Faircheallaigh. (2010) Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment: Purposes, Implications and Lessons for public Policy Making. Environmental impact Assessment Review, 30(1), pp. 19-27.

Ortwin R., Andreas K., Marjolein Van A. (2011) Coping with Complexity, Certainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis. AMBIO——A Journal of the Human Environment , 40(2), pp, 231-246.

Peter H. (2014) The “credibility thesis”and its Application to Property Rights: In Secure Land Tenure, Conflict and Social Welfare in China. Land Use Policy. 40: pp. 13-27.

Rabel J.B. (2004)The Concepts, Process and Methods of Social Impact Assessment, Dog-Eared Publications.

Shan, C., & Yai, T. (2011) Public Involvement Requirements for Infrastructure Planning in China, Habitat International, 35 (1), pp. 158-166.

Tan, Q. (2011) County Government Reform in Urbanizing China. Lex Localis——Journal of Local Self-government. 9(4), pp. 353-371.

Tang, B.S., Wong, S.W. (2008) Social Impact Assessment and Public Participation in China: A Case Study of Land requisition in Guangzhou. Environmental impact Assessment Review .28(1), pp. 57-72.

Terry, H.Y., Li, S., Thomas N. et al. (2012) Public Participation in Infrastructure and Construction Projects in China: From an EIA-based to A Whole-cycle Process. Habitat International, 36(1), pp. 47-56.

Vanclay F.M. (2003) International Principles for Social Impact Assessment, Impact Assessment Project Appraisal, 21(1), pp. 5-12.

White, R. (2004) Controversies in Environmental Sociology, Environmental Politics, 15(1), pp. 59-77.

Xu H, Ding Y. (2005) Discussion on Public Participation in Social Security Policy Making. Chinese Public Administration, 235, pp. 104-109.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

The Components of Islamic Civilization; A Lasting Heritage and Evolving Visions. (2026). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.52152/caqzkg61