Organizational Archetypes in Public Procurement


  • Predrag Jovanovic Institute of Social Sciences
  • Boris Delibašić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences
  • Mladen Čudanov University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences



public procurement process, organisational patterns, organisational decision-making authority, formalisation, motivation


The paper analyses a situation where the efficient public procurement legislative framework formally exists, but in practice, the process does not work as planned. The data were gathered from one hundred contracting authorities in the Republic of Serbia, based on a nationwide survey conducted on public procurement officers (PPOs) and end-users (ENUs) in all contracting authorities. We propose a model for measuring organisational discrepancies and classifying public procurement processes (PPP) into one of four organisational patterns, based on organisational decision-making authority and focused on goals and principles. The Mann-Whitney U (MWU) test was used to test the independent responses from two hundred PPOs and ENUs on the items – who works, who is accountable, and who has benefits, for seven key public procurement activities. The statistical analysis shows that the public procurement process in Serbia can be classified as a process with centralised organisational decision-making authority, focused on form, with demotivated public procurement officers. The efforts for further improvement of the legislation are not expected to reach their full potential until solving organisational structure, reward system, environment, and culture issues.


Adams, S. J. (1965) Inequity in Social Exchange, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, pp. 267-299,

Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L. & Tanzi, V. (2010) Public sector efficiency: evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets, Applied Economics, 42(17), pp. 2147-2164,

Anti-corruption Council (2020) Report on appropriateness, Control and execution of public procurement in Serbia, available at: (February 26, 2021).

Ariely, D. (2010) The Upside of Irrationality: The Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home (London: HarperCollins).

Askfors, Y. & Fornstedt, H. (2018) The clash of managerial and professional logics in public procurement: Implications for innovation in the health-care sector, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(1), pp.78-90.

Ateljevic, J. & Budak, J. (2010) Corruption and public procurement: example from Croatia, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(4), pp.375-397.

Bandeira, O., Best, M., Khan, A., Prat, A., Rehman, M., Asad, S., A., Hussain, K. & Majid, A., O. (2017) Motivating bureaucrats: autonomy vs performance pay for public procurement in Pakistan (London: International Growth Centre) available at: (January 13, 2021).

Bobowski, S., Gola J., Przybylska M. & Szydło W. (2020) The Most Economically Advantageous Tender in the Public Procurement System in the European Union, In: Bilgin M., Danis H., Karabulut G. & Gözgor G. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives (Cham: Switzerland: Springer), p. 418,

Bromley, P. & Powell, W., W. (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world, Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), pp. 483–530,

Brunette, R., Klaaren, J. & Nqaba, P. (2019) Reform in the contract state: Embedded directions in public procurement regulation in South Africa, Development Southern Africa, 36(4), pp. 537-554,

Burton, M. R., Obel, B. & DeSanctis, G. (2011) Organizational Design: A Step by Step Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Chester, K. (2020) Public policy: The first line of defence, Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, pp. 256-261,

Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).

Croom, S. & Johnston, R (2003) E-service: Enhancing internal customer service through e-procurement, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), pp. 539-555,

Čudanov, M., Jovanović, P. & Jaško, O. (2018) Influence of the Public Procurement Procedure Type on the Duration of Public Procurement, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(2), pp. 361-378,

Darvishmotevali, M. (2019) Decentralization and innovative behavior: The moderating role of supervisor support, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 8, pp. 31-45, available at SSRN:

Dimitri, N., (2013) Best Value for Money in Procurement, Journal of Public Procurement, 13 (2), pp. 149-175,

European Commission (2019) Serbia 2019 report available at: (December 17, 2020).

European Commission (2017) European semester thematic factsheet – Public procurement available at: (December 18, 2020).

European Commission (2016) Serbia 2016 Report available at: (December 18, 2020).

Feynman, R. P. (1974) Cargo cult science, Engineering and Science, 37(7), pp. 10-13,

Flynn, A. & Davis, P. (2017) Theory in public procurement research, Journal of Public Procurement, 14 (21), pp. 139-180,

Glas, A. H., Schaupp, M. & Essig, M. (2017) An organizational perspective on the implementation of strategic goals in public procurement, Journal of public procurement, 17(4), pp. 572-605,

Greve, C., Lægreid, P. & Rykkja, L. H. (2016) The nordic model revisited: active reformers and high performing public administrations, In: Greve, C., Lægreid, P. & Rykkja, L. H. (eds.) Nordic administrative reforms (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 189-212.

Haack, P. & Schoeneborn, D. (2015) Is decoupling becoming decoupled from institutional theory? A commentary on Wijen, Academy of Management Review, 40(2), pp. 307-310,

Hameduddin, T., Fernandez, S., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2020) Conditions for open innovation in public organizations: evidence from, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), pp. 111-131.

Hladchenko, M. & Pinheiro, R. (2019) Implementing the Triple Helix model: Means-ends decoupling at the state level?, Minerva, 57(1), pp.1-22,

Huettermann, H., Berger, S., Reinwald, M., & Bruch, H. (2020) Broadening our Sight on the Decentralization-Organizational Performance Link: A Multi-Level Study. Academy of Management Proceedings 2020(1), p. 13892

Jaško, O., Jovanović, P. & Čudanov, M. (2015) Cost Efficiency of Public Procurement at Local Level: Chances for Improvement of Local Self-government and Public Enterprises in Serbia, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(3), pp. 789-807,

Jonsson, P., Rudberg, M. & Holmberg, S. (2013) Centralised supply chain planning at IKEA, Supply Chain Management, 18(3), pp. 337-350,

Kadirbeyoglu, Z. (2017) The impact of power and civic engagement in the decentralised management of natural resources: the case of Turkey, Public Administration and Development, 37(4), pp. 277-291,

Karam, E. P., Hu, J., Davison, R. B., Juravich, M., Nahrgang, J. D., Humphrey, S. E. & Scott DeRue, D. (2019) Illuminating the ‘face’of justice: A meta‐analytic examination of leadership and sorganisational justice, Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), pp. 134-171,

Kern, A., Laguecir, A. & Leca, B. (2018) Behind smoke and mirrors: a political approach to decoupling, Organisation Studies, 39(4), pp. 543-564,

Korbee, D., Hong Quan, N., Hermans, L. & Ho Long, P. (2019) Navigating the bureaucracy: an analysis of implementation feasibility for the Mekong Delta Plan, Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(9), pp. 1545-1561.

Kumar, A., Nair, A. & Piecha, J. (2015) Measuring efficiency in international public procurement, Journal of public procurement, 15(3), pp. 365-389,

Leclercq, T., Poncin, I., Hammedi, W., Kullak, A. & Hollebeek, L. D. (2020) When gamification backfires: the impact of perceived justice on online community contributions, Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5-6), pp. 550-577,

Lindkvist, L. & Llewellyn, S. (2003) Accountability, responsibility and organisation, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(2), pp. 251-273,

Martin, W. L., McKelvie, A. & Lumpkin, G. T. (2016) Centralisation and delegation practices in family versus non-family SMEs: a Rasch analysis, Small Business Economics, 47(3), pp. 755-769,

Murray Svidronova, M. & Nemec, J. (2016) E-Procurement in Self-Governing Regions in Slovakia, Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, Volume 14, No. 3, pp. 323-337, July 2016, DOI 10.4335/14.3.323-337(2016).

McCue, C. P., Prier, E. & Swanson, D. (2015) Five dilemmas in public procurement, Journal of PublicProcurement, 15(2), pp. 177-207,

McGrath, S. K. & Whitty, S. J. (2018) Accountability and responsibility defined, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(3), pp. 687-707,

Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalised organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), pp. 340–63,

Milosavljević, M., Milanović, N. & Benković, S. (2016) Politics, Policies and Public Procurement Efficiency: A Quantitative Study of 25 European Countries, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(3), pp. 539-560,

Milosavljević, M., Dobrota, M., & Milanović, N. (2019). A new approach to the evaluation of public procurement efficiency among European countries. European Review, 27(2), 246-259.

Mintzberg, H. (1993) Structure in fives: Designing effective organisations (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc).

Nemec, J., Kubak, M., Krapek, M. & Horehajova, M. (2020) Competition in Public Procurement in the Czech and Slovak Public Health Care Sectors, Healthcare. 2020; 8(3):201.

Patrucco, A. S., Moretto, A., Ronchi, S. & Luzzini, D. (2019) Organisational choices in public procurement: What can public management learn from the private sector?, Local Government Studies, 45(6), pp. 977-1000,

Patrucco, A. S., Luzzini, D. & Ronchi, S. (2017) Research perspectives on public procurement: Content analysis of 14 years of publications in the journal of public procurement, Journal of Public Procurement, 17(2), pp. 229-269. (2017).

Plaček, M., Nemec, J., Ochrana, F., Schmidt, M. & Půček, M. (2020) Analysis of Factors of Overpricing in Public Procurement: A Study for Low-performing EU Countries, International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), pp. 350-360,

Polzer, T. & Reichard, C. (2020). IPSAS for European Union member states as starting points for EPSAS, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3), pp. 247-264,

Public Procurement Office (2019), Annual Report 2019,

Rolfstam, M. (2009) Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: The role of institutions, Science and Public Policy, 36(5), pp. 349-360,

Schwartz, J. I. (2007) Regulation and deregulation in public procurement law reform in the United States, In: Piga, G. & Thai, K. V. (eds.) Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation and Best Practices (Boca Raton, FL: PrAcademics Press), pp.177-201.

Tátrai, T. & Vörösmarty, G. (2020) Non-Compliance in Public Procurement – Comparative Study Under EU Law, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 61, pp. 143-161,

Thaler, R.H. (2016) Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics (UK: Penguin books).

Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C. & Klausen, K. K. (2020) Public Governance Paradigms: Competing and Co-Existing (UK: Edward Elgar Publishing).

Trindade, P. C., Antunes, P. & Partidário, P. (2018) SPP toolbox: Supporting sustainable public procurement in the context of socio-technical transitions, Sustainability, 10(1), pp. 1-26,

Trybus M. (2006) The Reform of Public Procurement Laws in the Western Balkans, In: Piga, G. & Thai, K. V. (eds.) Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation and Best Practices (Boca Raton, FL: PrAcademics Press), pp.392-412.

Vaidya, K., Yu, P. & Soar, J. (2002) Measuring e-procurement performance in the Australian public sectors: A preliminary approach, In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) EC '06: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (New York: Association for Computing Machinery).

Vriens, D., Vosselman, E. & Groß, C. (2018) Public professional accountability: A conditional approach, Journal of Business Ethics, 153(4), pp. 1179-1196,

Wijen, F. (2014) Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption, Academy of Management Review, 39(3), pp. 302-323,

Wynen, J., Verhoest, K. & Kleizen, B. (2017) More reforms, less innovation? The impact of structural reform histories on innovation-oriented cultures in public organisations, Public Management Review, 19(8), pp. 1142-1164,