The Tort Liability of Internet Hosting Providers
Ključne besede:
Internet Hosting Providers; Tort Liability; Online Content; Intermediary Liability; Exemption from Liability; Digital Services; Comparative Law; Algerian LawPovzetek
The rapid development of the Internet and digital communication has increased the importance of internet hosting providers, which play a fundamental role in storing and making information available online. However, the activities of these providers raise significant legal questions concerning their tort liability for unlawful content published or stored by third parties. This study examines the legal framework governing the tort liability of internet hosting providers, focusing on the distinction between hosting providers, internet service providers, and content providers. It also explores the conditions under which hosting providers may be held liable for damages arising from illegal or harmful online content, as well as the circumstances in which they may benefit from an exemption from liability. The study adopts a legal and comparative approach by examining relevant legislation and judicial decisions in French, European, American, and Algerian law. Particular attention is given to the legal requirements governing the establishment of liability, including the provider’s knowledge of unlawful content and its response after becoming aware of such content. The study highlights the importance of balancing the protection of individuals’ rights and interests with the freedom of expression and the development of digital services. It also emphasizes the need to clarify the legal obligations of hosting providers and strengthen the effectiveness of the applicable legal framework, particularly in Algeria.
Literatura
2. Abashidze, A., Gugunskiy, D., Koneva, A., Simonova, M., & Solntsev, A. (2015). Current problems of interstate cooperation of Russian federation for the protection of children in case of disputes between parents living in different states. Asian Social Science, 337-342.
3. Abashidze, A., Solntsev, A., Koneva, A., Gugunskiy, D., & Grigorieva, N. (2015). Current issues of application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National level. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 289-298.
4. Atkinson, J. (2011). The meaning of habitual residence under the Hague Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction and the Hague Convention on the protection of children. Oklahoma Law Review, 654.
5. Beaumont, P., Trimmings, K., Walker, L., & Holliday, J. (2015). Child abduction: Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 64(1), 39-63.
6. Bruch, C. (1994). The Central Authority`s Role Under the Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Friend in Deed. Family Law Quarterly, n.a.
7. DeHart, G. (2000). The Relationship between the 1980 Child Abduction Convention and the 1996 Protection Convention. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, n.a.
8. Fiorini, A. (2012). Habitual residence and the new-born - a French perspective. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 530-540.
9. Garbolino, J. (2015). The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: A Guide for Judges, in: Federal Judicial Centre International Litigation Guide (2nd ed.). Federal Judicial Centre, n.a.
10. George, R. (2014). Children's state of mind and habitual residence in abduction cases. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 311-313.
11. González Martín, N. (2015). International Parental Child Abduction and Mediation. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 353-412.
12. Gration, M., Curry-Sumner, I., Williams, Q., Setright, Q., & Wright, M. (1996). International Issues in Family Law. The 1996 Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Brussels IIa. Jordan Publishing, n.a.
13. Heri, C., & Keller, H. (2015). Protecting the best interests of the child: International child abduction and the European Court of human rights. Nordic Journal of International Law, 270-296.
14. Jacobsen, A. (2013). Children's Rights in the European Court of Human Rights-An Emerging Power Structure. International Journal of Children's Rights, 548-574.
15. Jolly, S. (2017). International parental child abduction: An explorative analysis of legal standards & judicial interpretation in India. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 20-40.
16. Lowe, N., & Stephens, V. (2012). Global trends in the operation of the 1980 Hague abduction convention. Family Law Quarterly, 41-85.
17. McEleavy, P. (2015). The European Court of Human Rights and the Hague Child Abduction Convention: Prioritising Return or Reflection? Netherlands International Law Review, 365-405.
18. Melcher, C. (2013). The Role of the Mental Health Professional in Assessing Grave Risk of Harm Under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction. Journal of Child Custody, 236-251.
19. Ong, D. (2007). Parental child abduction in Singapore: The experience of a non-convention country. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 220-241.
20. Perez–Vera, E. (1980). Explanatory Report: Hague Conference on Private International Law, in: Acts and Documents of the Fourteenth Session. Child abduction, 426-476.
21. Pirrung, J. (2012). Improvements to international child protection as a result of the 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention. International Family Law, n.a.
22. Rains, R. (2014). The 1980 Hague Abduction Convention: Comparative Aspects. Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing, n.a.
23. Scarano, N. (2016). Protection of children and the 1996 Hague convention. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 205-207.
24. Siehr, K. (2012). The 1996 Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and its application in the EU and the world. International Family Law, n.a.
25. Yamaguchi, S., & Lindhorst, T. (2016). Domestic violence and the implementation of the Hague convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction: Japan and U.S. policy. Journal of International Women's Studies, 16-30.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrika
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2026 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
