Rawlsova teorija pravičnosti kot poštenosti kot temelj in izziv za lokalno samoupravo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4335/20.3.641-665(2022)Ključne besede:
lokalna samouprava, pravičnost kot poštenost, oseba, svoboda, liberalizemPovzetek
Rawlsov povsem izvirni argument »pravičnosti kot poštenosti« je vedno aktualen, saj se sodobna etika in politična filozofija soočata s tako imenovano proceduralno etiko, kjer je vse urejeno in določeno z ustreznimi postopki, pravno zakonodajo, akti in predpisi, vendar zelo pogosto manjka »etični humus«, zakaj in kako je treba to izvajati. Posebne razmere na določenem lokalnem območju so pogosto preveč odvisne od kapitala in pod prevelikim pritiskom njegove moči. Zaradi vsega navedenega je Rawlsova teorija velik izziv, prav tako pa tudi etični in pravni humus, kako oblikovati lokalno samoupravo, kjer se upoštevajo vsa osnovna načela pravičnosti, svobode, dostojanstva vsakega posameznika in družbeni vidik medosebnih odnosov, kjer se da poseben poudarek na skrb za vse tiste, ki so v najslabšem položaju, najbolj krhki, ranljivi, najbolj spregledani in za katere nikomur ni mar.
Literatura
Barber, B. (1989) Justifying Justice: Problems of Psycholoy, Politics and Measurement in Rawls, In: Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford Press), pp. 292-318.
Barry, B. (1993) Good for us, but not for them, The Guardian, 14th August, p. 23.
Brown, A. (1990) Modern moral Philosophy (London: Penguin books).
Biebricher, T. (2018) The Polical Theory ob Neoliberalism (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press).
Buckle, S. (1993) Natural law, In: Singer, P. (ed.) A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 161-174.
Daniels, N. (ed.) (1989) Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty, In: Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 253-282.
Diggs, B. J. (1981) A Contract view of Respect for Persons, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18(4), pp. 273-281.
Dombrowski, D. A. (2021) Process Phiosophy and Political Liberalism, Rawls, Whitehead, Hartsmore (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
Dworkin, R. (1989) The Original Position, In: Norman, D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 16-52.
Hare, R. M. (1989) Rawls' Theory of Justice, In: Norman D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 81-107.
Hart, H. L. A. (1989) Rawls on Liberty and its Priority, In: Norman D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 230-252.
Honderich, T. (ed.) (1995) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Jeske, D. (1993) Persons, Compensation, and Utilitarianism, The Philosophical Review, 102 (4), pp. 541- 575.
Jamnik, A. (2018) Svet osamljenih tujcev, Komunitarna in postmoderna kritika liberalizma (Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga).
Kukathas, C. & Pettit, P. (1992) Rawls - A Theory of Justice and its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press).
MacIntrye, A. (1989) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press).
MacIntyre, A. (1993) Kratka zgodovina etike (Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče).
Nagel, T. (1973) Rawls on Justice, Philosophical Review, 82 (2), pp. 220-234.
Nagel, T.(1989) Rawls on Justice, In: Norman D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 1-16.
Novak, M. (1993) The Catholic Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: The Free Press).
Olssen, M. (2010) Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Social Democracy (New York: Routledge).
Plant, R. (1992) Modern Political Thought (United Kingdom: Oxford, United States of America: Cambridge).
Raphael, D. D. (1990) Problems of Political Philosophy (London: Macmillan).
Rawls, J. (1971) Theory of Justice (Cabmridge: Belknap - Harvard University Press).
Sterba, J. (1986) Recent Work on alternative conceptions of Justice, American Philosophical Quarterly, 23(3), pp. 1-22.
Stres, A. (1996) Strpnost med skepso in spoštovanjem, In: Teološki tečaj o aktualnih temah za študente in izobražence, Strpnost iz ljubezni: zbornik predavanj s Teološkega tečaja o aktualnih temah za študente in izobražence 1995/96 (Ljubljana: Skupnost katoliške mladine), pp. 9-32.
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self, The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Weithman, P. (2017) Rawls, Political Liberalism and Reasonable Faith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Wolff, J. (1996) An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Zemach, E. M. (1989) Not good, just just, American Philosophical Quarterly, 26(4), pp. 321-331.
Barry, B. (1993) Good for us, but not for them, The Guardian, 14th August, p. 23.
Brown, A. (1990) Modern moral Philosophy (London: Penguin books).
Biebricher, T. (2018) The Polical Theory ob Neoliberalism (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press).
Buckle, S. (1993) Natural law, In: Singer, P. (ed.) A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 161-174.
Daniels, N. (ed.) (1989) Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty, In: Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 253-282.
Diggs, B. J. (1981) A Contract view of Respect for Persons, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18(4), pp. 273-281.
Dombrowski, D. A. (2021) Process Phiosophy and Political Liberalism, Rawls, Whitehead, Hartsmore (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
Dworkin, R. (1989) The Original Position, In: Norman, D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 16-52.
Hare, R. M. (1989) Rawls' Theory of Justice, In: Norman D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 81-107.
Hart, H. L. A. (1989) Rawls on Liberty and its Priority, In: Norman D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 230-252.
Honderich, T. (ed.) (1995) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Jeske, D. (1993) Persons, Compensation, and Utilitarianism, The Philosophical Review, 102 (4), pp. 541- 575.
Jamnik, A. (2018) Svet osamljenih tujcev, Komunitarna in postmoderna kritika liberalizma (Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga).
Kukathas, C. & Pettit, P. (1992) Rawls - A Theory of Justice and its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press).
MacIntrye, A. (1989) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press).
MacIntyre, A. (1993) Kratka zgodovina etike (Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče).
Nagel, T. (1973) Rawls on Justice, Philosophical Review, 82 (2), pp. 220-234.
Nagel, T.(1989) Rawls on Justice, In: Norman D. (ed.) Reading Rawls (California: Stanford University Press), pp. 1-16.
Novak, M. (1993) The Catholic Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: The Free Press).
Olssen, M. (2010) Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Social Democracy (New York: Routledge).
Plant, R. (1992) Modern Political Thought (United Kingdom: Oxford, United States of America: Cambridge).
Raphael, D. D. (1990) Problems of Political Philosophy (London: Macmillan).
Rawls, J. (1971) Theory of Justice (Cabmridge: Belknap - Harvard University Press).
Sterba, J. (1986) Recent Work on alternative conceptions of Justice, American Philosophical Quarterly, 23(3), pp. 1-22.
Stres, A. (1996) Strpnost med skepso in spoštovanjem, In: Teološki tečaj o aktualnih temah za študente in izobražence, Strpnost iz ljubezni: zbornik predavanj s Teološkega tečaja o aktualnih temah za študente in izobražence 1995/96 (Ljubljana: Skupnost katoliške mladine), pp. 9-32.
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self, The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Weithman, P. (2017) Rawls, Political Liberalism and Reasonable Faith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Wolff, J. (1996) An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Zemach, E. M. (1989) Not good, just just, American Philosophical Quarterly, 26(4), pp. 321-331.
Objavljeno
2022-06-21
Številka
Rubrika
Article
Kako citirati
Rawlsova teorija pravičnosti kot poštenosti kot temelj in izziv za lokalno samoupravo. (2022). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 20(3), 641-665. https://doi.org/10.4335/20.3.641-665(2022)
