The Admissibility of Defences against the Substantive Claim in Cross-Border Enforcement of Judgments in Europe

Avtorji

  • Andrej Ekart University of Maribor, Faculty of Law, Mladinska ulica 9, Maribor
  • Sylvia Zangl Law firm Drexel, Weirer, Schaar, Graz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/9.4.311-333(2011)

Povzetek

Authors discuss the admissibility of defences against the substantive claim (e.g. objection of the debtor that the enforceable claim has been discharged) in cross-border enforcement in Europe. In the context of Regulation 44/2001 in some countries, like Germany, courts have admitted such defences in exequatur proceeding. In other countries, like Slovenia and Austria, such objections have to be asserted with legal remedies of the national execution law. Debtor can defend himself against European enforcement order, order for payment and small claims judgment with legal remedies of national execution law, if he has discharged the debt after the rendering of decision. Keywords: • cross-border enforcement • European enforcement order • European order for payment • European small claims procedure • international jurisdiction • EU

Objavljeno

2011-10-19

Številka

Rubrika

Article

Kako citirati

The Admissibility of Defences against the Substantive Claim in Cross-Border Enforcement of Judgments in Europe. (2011). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 9(4), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.4335/9.4.311-333(2011)