Pristop lokalnega sistema zaščite otrok z vidika družbenega omrežja in možnosti njegove interpretacije – študija primera
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4335/15.2.263-281(2017)Ključne besede:
lokalni sistem zaščite otrok, centralizacija, medosebni odnosi, formalnoPovzetek
Pričujoča študija se osredotoča na lokalni sistem zaščite otrok. Njen namen je prikazati podrobno sliko strukture sistema, hkrati pa nameniti posebno pozornost medosebnim odnosom in delu prek medosebnih povezav. Postavili smo hipotezo, da obstaja med oblastmi in institucijami močna, neformalna mreža. Študija vključuje tudi dimenzijo družbenih povezav pri interpretaciji. Predpostavljamo, da nagnjenost k centralizaciji nima pomembnega vpliva na lokalni sistem zaščite otrok, saj gre za dinamični sistem, katerega delovanje temelji na odnosih posameznikov in strokovnjakov.
Literatura
Aronson, E. (2008) The Social Being (Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó)
Baldwin, R. (1995) Rules and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press).
Ehleiter, J. (2007) The Theory and Practice of Settlement Control (Budapest: HVG-ORAC Lap és Könyvkiadó Kft.).
Ehmann, B. (2002) Deep in the Text – The Psychological Content Analysis (Budapest: Új Mandátum Kiadó).
Ericsson, K. (2000) Social Control and Emancipation? Ambiguities in Child Welfare, Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1(1), pp. 16-26, doi: 10.1080/14043850050116237.
Ferguson, H. (2004) Protecting Children in Time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences of Modernity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Gordon, T. & Noel, B. (2016) Human Relations (Budapest: Assertiv Kiadó).
Horváth M., T. (2013) Aspects for Analysis of the Regulatory Changes in Local Public Services In: Horváth M., T. (ed.) Swings. Changes in Public Service Delivery (Budapest: Dialóg Campus) pp. 9–25.
Houston, S. & Griffiths, H. (2000) Reflections on risk in child protection: is it time for a shift in paradigm?, Child & Family Social Work, 5(1) pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00145.x.
Krippendorf, K. (1999) Content Analysis, In: Sallay, H. (ed.) Collection of Methodological Texts (Debrecen: Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó) pp. 105-153.
Krippendorf, K. (2013) Content Analysis – An Introduction to Its Methodolgy (Sage Publications, Inc.).
Mérei, F. (2006) The Hidden Network of Communities – The Sociometric Interpretation (Budapest: Osiris Kiadó).
Munro, E. (1999) Common Errors of Reasoning in Child Protection Work, Child Abuse & Neglect, 8(23), pp.745–758.
Parton, N. (1998) Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity?, The British Journal of Social Work, 28(1) pp. 5-27, doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317.
Péteri, G. (2000) Alternative Service Management, In: Nemec, J. & Wright, G. (ed.): Communal Finance. Theory and Practice in the Central European Transition (Budapest: Aula) pp. 434–465.
Roeders, P. & Gefferth, É. (2007) The secret of effective learning – The dynamics of effective teaching and learning (Budapest: Trefort Kiadó).
Szöllősi, G. (2003) The Problem of Child Protection as a Social Construction, Chance, 14(2), pp. 75–95.
Varju, M. (2002) The Disciple of Regulation – Introduction to the Study of Regulatory State (Debrecen: University notes, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Law).
Wilson, K. & James, A. (2007) The Child Protection Handbook (London: Elsevier Limited).
Baldwin, R. (1995) Rules and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press).
Ehleiter, J. (2007) The Theory and Practice of Settlement Control (Budapest: HVG-ORAC Lap és Könyvkiadó Kft.).
Ehmann, B. (2002) Deep in the Text – The Psychological Content Analysis (Budapest: Új Mandátum Kiadó).
Ericsson, K. (2000) Social Control and Emancipation? Ambiguities in Child Welfare, Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1(1), pp. 16-26, doi: 10.1080/14043850050116237.
Ferguson, H. (2004) Protecting Children in Time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences of Modernity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Gordon, T. & Noel, B. (2016) Human Relations (Budapest: Assertiv Kiadó).
Horváth M., T. (2013) Aspects for Analysis of the Regulatory Changes in Local Public Services In: Horváth M., T. (ed.) Swings. Changes in Public Service Delivery (Budapest: Dialóg Campus) pp. 9–25.
Houston, S. & Griffiths, H. (2000) Reflections on risk in child protection: is it time for a shift in paradigm?, Child & Family Social Work, 5(1) pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00145.x.
Krippendorf, K. (1999) Content Analysis, In: Sallay, H. (ed.) Collection of Methodological Texts (Debrecen: Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó) pp. 105-153.
Krippendorf, K. (2013) Content Analysis – An Introduction to Its Methodolgy (Sage Publications, Inc.).
Mérei, F. (2006) The Hidden Network of Communities – The Sociometric Interpretation (Budapest: Osiris Kiadó).
Munro, E. (1999) Common Errors of Reasoning in Child Protection Work, Child Abuse & Neglect, 8(23), pp.745–758.
Parton, N. (1998) Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity?, The British Journal of Social Work, 28(1) pp. 5-27, doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317.
Péteri, G. (2000) Alternative Service Management, In: Nemec, J. & Wright, G. (ed.): Communal Finance. Theory and Practice in the Central European Transition (Budapest: Aula) pp. 434–465.
Roeders, P. & Gefferth, É. (2007) The secret of effective learning – The dynamics of effective teaching and learning (Budapest: Trefort Kiadó).
Szöllősi, G. (2003) The Problem of Child Protection as a Social Construction, Chance, 14(2), pp. 75–95.
Varju, M. (2002) The Disciple of Regulation – Introduction to the Study of Regulatory State (Debrecen: University notes, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Law).
Wilson, K. & James, A. (2007) The Child Protection Handbook (London: Elsevier Limited).
Objavljeno
2017-04-01
Številka
Rubrika
Article
Kako citirati
Pristop lokalnega sistema zaščite otrok z vidika družbenega omrežja in možnosti njegove interpretacije – študija primera. (2017). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(2), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.4335/15.2.263-281(2017)
