Sooblikovanje lepše soseske: zakaj sodelujemo v razvojnih projektih lokalnih skupnosti?

Avtorji

  • Daphne Vanleene Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Public Governance, Management and Finance
  • Joris Voets Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Public Governance, Management and Finance
  • Bram Verschuere Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Public Governance, Management and Finance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/15.1.111-132(2017)

Ključne besede:

sooblikovanje, motivacija prebivalcev, razvoj skupnosti, lokalna raven upravljanja, Belgija

Povzetek

Sooblikovanje se pogosto obravnava kot rešitev za izboljšanje kakovosti storitev in učinkovitosti proizvodnje, kljub temu pa so raziskave o razlogih, zakaj prebivalci sodelujejo pri oblikovanju in/ali opravljanju javnih storitev, še vedno omejene le na določene sektorje. V prispevku proučujemo različne motivacije prebivalcev, ki so obravnavane v literaturi. Oblikovali smo dve različni kategoriji motivacije, in sicer osebno in posredno. Prek vodene raziskave smo zbrali podatke o teh različnih motivacijah na belgijskem primeru v neraziskanem okolju razvoja skupnosti. Rezultati kažejo, da so celo v primeru razvoja skupnosti, kjer so za privabljanje k sodelovanju prebivalcev v ranljivem socialno gospodarskem položaju uporabljene materialne spodbude, razlogi za sooblikovanje bolj raznoliki in zapleteni od enostavne maksimizacije koristi.

Biografije avtorja

  • Researcher

  • Assistant professor

  • Assistant professor

Literatura

Alford, J. (2002) Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory, Administration & Society 34(1), pp. 32-56, doi: 10.1177/0095399702034001004.
Alford, J. (2009) Engaging public sector clients, From Service Delivery to Co-production. Houndmills (Hamps and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
Alford, J. (2011) Public value from co-production by clients, In: Benington, J. & Moore, M. (eds.) Public value: theory and practice (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
Asquer (2012) Co-investment in co-production of public services: Are clients willing to do it?, Workshop on "Co-production in public services: the state of the art", Corvinus University, Budapest.
Blakeley, G. & Brendan, E. (2009) Who Participates, How and Why in Urban Regeneration Projects? The Case of the New 'City' of East Manchester, Social Policy & Administration, 43(1), pp. 15-32, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00643.x.
Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E. & Parrado, S. (2015) Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services, Journal of Social Policy, 44(01), pp. 1-23, doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000567.
Bovaird, T. & Loeffler, E. (2012) From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), pp. 1119–1138.
Boyle, D., Clark, S. & Burns, S. (2006) Hidden Work: Co-production by People Outside Paid Employment (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
Brady, H. E., Verba, S. & Lehman Schlozman, K. (1995) Beyond Ses: A Resource Model of Political Participation, The American Political Science Review, 89(2), pp. 271-294, doi: 10.2307/2082425.
Brandsen, T. & Helderman, J.-K. (2012) The Trade-Off Between Capital and Community: The Conditions for Successful Co-production in Housing, Voluntas, 23(4), pp. 1139-1155, doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9310-0.
Brandsen, T. & Honingh, M. (2015) Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions, Public Administration Review: 427-435, doi: 10.1111/puar.12465.
Brandsen, T., Trommel, W. & Verschuere, B. (2014) Manufactured Civil Society: Practices, Principles and Effects (London: Palgrave).
de Graaf, L., van Hulst, M. & Michels, A. (2015) Enhancing Participation in Disadvantaged Urban Neighbourhoods, Local Government Studies, 41(1), pp. 44-62, doi: 10.1080/03003930.2014.908771.
Debruyn, P. & De Bisschop, A. (2013) Transitie: de meesterzet van de ideologie?, Oikos, 65, pp. 46-62.
Denters, B. & Klok, P.-J. (2010) Rebuilding Roombeek: Patterns of Citizen Participation in Urban Governance, Urban Affairs Review, 45(5), pp. 583-607, doi: 10.1177/1078087409356756.
Durose, C. (2011) Revisiting Lipsky: Front-Line Work in UK Local Governance, Political Studies, 59(4), pp. 978-995, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00886.x.
Fledderus, J. & Honingh, M. (2016) Why people co-produce within activation services: the necessity of motivation and trust – an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation programme in the Netherlands, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), pp. 69-87, doi: 10.1177/0020852314566006.
Frieling, M. A., Lindenberg, S. M. & Stokman, F. N. (2014) Collaborative Communities Through Coproduction: Two Case Studies, American Review of Public Administration, 44(1), pp. 35-58, doi: 10.1177/0275074012456897.
Fung, A. (2004) Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).
Head, W. A. (1979) Community Development in Post Industrial Society: Myth or Reality? Community Development: Theory and Method of Planned Change (New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House).
Jakobsen, M. (2013) Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), pp. 27-54, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus036.
Jakobsen, M. & Calmar Andersen, S. (2013) Coproduction and Equity in Public Service Delivery, Public Administration Review, 73(5), 704-713, doi: 10.1111/puar.12094.
Löffler, E. & Watt, P. (2009) Understanding the efficiency implications of coproduction, In: Barker, A. (ed) Co-Production of Local Public Services (London: LARCI).
Marschall, M. J. (2004) Citizen Participation and the Neighborhood Context: A New Look at the Coproduction of Local Public Goods, Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), pp. 231-244, doi: 10.2307/3219867.
Ostrom, E. (1999) Crossing the great divide. Co-production, synergy & development, polycentric governance and development, McGinnes, M. D. (ed) Reading from the workshop in political and policy analysis (Ann Arbor, MI).
Ostrom, E. (1996) Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development, World Development, 24(6), pp. 1073-1087, doi: 10.1016/0305-750x(96)00023-x.
Parks, R. B., Baker, P., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R. J., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M., Whitaker, G. P. & Wilson, R. (1981) Consumers as Co-producers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations, Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), pp. 1001-1011.
Pestoff, V. (2006) Citizens and co-production of welfare services, Public Management Review, 8(4), pp. 503-519, doi: 10.1080/14719030601022882.
Pestoff, V. (2012) Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence, Voluntas, 23(4), pp. 1102-1118, doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7.
Rosentraub, M. S. & Sharp, E. B. (1981) Consumers and producers of social services: Co-production and the level of social services, Southern Review of Public Administration, 4, pp. 502–539
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2004) Methoden en technieken van onderzoek (Amsterdam: Pearson Education Benelux).
Schneider, B. & Bowen, D. E. (1995) Winning the Service Game (Brighton: Harvard Business School Press).
Sharp, E. B. (1978) Citizen Organizations in Policing Issues and Crime Prevention: Incentives for Participation, Journal of Voluntary Action, 7(1-2), pp. 45-58, doi: doi:10.1177/089976407800700106.
Simmons, R. & Birchall, J. (2005) A joined-up approach to user participation in public services: Strengthening the "participation chain, Social Policy & Administration, 39(3), pp. 260-283, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00439.x.
Staes, B. (2012) Rabot is de armste Gentse wijk, Drongen de rijkste, het Nieuwsblad, 12/10/2012.
Steen, T. (2006) Public Sector Motivation: Is There Something to Learn From the Study of Volunteerism?, Public Policy and Administration, 21, pp. 49-62.
Sundeen, R. A. (1988) Explaining participation in co-production - a study of volunteers, Social Science Quarterly, 69(3), pp. 547-568.
Van Dooren, W, & Thijssen, P. (2015) Who you are / where you live. Do neighbourhood characteristics explain coproduction, International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(2), pp. 88-109.
van Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2013) Waarom burgers coproducent willen zijn: Een theoretisch model om de motivaties van coproducerende burgers te verklaren, Bestuurskunde, 22(4), pp. 72-81.
van Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2014) Why People Co-Produce: Analysing citizens' perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services, Public Management Review, 16(3), pp. 358-382, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841458.
Van Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2016) Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), pp. 28-46, doi: 10.1177/0020852314566007.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. & Brady, H. E. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T. & Pestoff, V. (2012) Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda, Voluntas, 23(4), pp. 1083-1101, doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M. & Tummers, L. G. (2014) A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, pp. 1-25, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
Wagenaar, H. (2007) Governance, complexity, and democratic participation - How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline, American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), pp. 17-50, doi: 10.1177/0275074006296208.
Webler, T. & Tuler, S. (2000) Fairness and competence in citizen participation - Theoretical reflections from a case study, Administration & Society, 32(5), pp. 566-595, doi: 10.1177/00953990022019588.
Yin, R. (2009) Case Study Research: design and methods (New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.).

Objavljeno

2017-01-31

Številka

Rubrika

Article