Skupnostno tolmačenje za lokalne javne institucije v Mariboru – Izvedba medkulturne pravne klinike
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4335/18.2.349-369(2020)Ključne besede:
medkulturna pravna klinika, tolmačenje za skupnost, sodno tolmačenje, SlovenijaPovzetek
Prispevek se osredotoča na možnost zagotavljanja prevajalsko-tolmaških storitev, ki se izvajajo pod vodstvom mentorjev in so namenjene pravnim tolmačem in strokovnjakov na sodišču v Mariboru v obliki medkulturne klinike, ki je organizirana kot izbirni predmet na univerzitetni ravni. V empiričnem delu članek obravnava rezultate intervjujev s pravnimi tolmači in strokovnjaki na kazenskem oddelku sodišča v Mariboru. Na podlagi gradiva, pridobljenega s pomočjo vprašalnikov in intervjujev, v tem poglavju analizirava poglede pravnih tolmačev in pravnih strokovnjakov na njihovo vlogo, medsebojno sodelovanje, konflikte, ki lahko nastanejo, ter na omejitve njihovih funkcij, vse v okviru obstoječega nudenja storitev tolmačenja, ki se izvaja na sodišču v Mariboru. Analiza podatkov je vodila k ustanovitvi medkulturne pravne klinike v obliki izbirnega predmeta na Filozofski fakulteti Univerze v Mariboru. Raziskava je bila izvedena v okviru projekta “TransLaw: Exploring Legal Interpreting Service Paths and Transcultural Law Clinics for persons suspected or accused of a crime” (v slovenščini: TransLaw: raziskovanje poti za storitve pravnega tolmačenja in Medkulturna pravna klinika za osebe, osumljene ali obtožene kaznivih dejanj), ki ga je financirala Evropska unija.
Literatura
Bartoli, C. (2016) Legal clinics in Europe: for a commitment of higher education in social justice, Diritto & questioni pubbliche, Special Issue, pp. 1-100, available at: http://www.dirittoequestionipubbliche.org/page/2016_nSE_Legal-clinics-in-Europe/DQ_2016_Legal-Clinics-in-Europe_specialissue.pdf (Septemer 6, 2019).
Berk-Seligson, S. (2000) Interpreting for the police: Issues in pre-trial phases of the judicial process, Forensic Linguistics, 7(2), pp. 212-237.
Bloch, F. (2008) Access to justice and the global clinical movement, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 28(1), available at http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol28/iss1/6 (January 6, 2020).
Corsellis, A. (2008) Public Service Interpreting. The First Steps (London: Palgrave MacMillan).
Falbo, C. & Viezzi, M. (eds.) (2014). Traduzione e interpretazione per la società e le istituzioni (Trieste: EUT).
Gorjanc, V. (ed.) (2013). Slovensko tolmačeslovje (Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani).
Hannemann, J.-C. A. & Georg, D (2016) Studentische Rechtsberatung und Clinical Legal Education in Deutschland (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer).
Hale, S. (2013) Interpreting culture. Dealing with cross-cultural issues in court interpreting, Perspectives Studies in Translatology, 22(3), pp. 321-331.
Hale, S. & Napier, J. (2013) Research Methods in Interpreting. A Practical Resource (London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury).
Ikuko, N. (2009) The myth of an 'invisible mediator': An Australian case study of English-Japanese police interpreting [online], Portal Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 6(1), avaialble at https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=074729605752103;res=IELHSS (January 6, 2020).
Hale, S & Napier. J. (2013) Research Methods in Interpreting: a Practical Resource (London: Bloomsbury).
Kadrić, M. (2019) Gerichts-und Behördendolmetschen. Prozessrechtliche und translatorische Perspektiven (Wien:facultas).
Kilian, M. & Wenzel, L. (2017) Law Clinics in Deutschland: Zahlen, Typologien und Strukturen Mehr als 60 Law Clinics haben sich im Umfeld der juristischen Fakultäten gebildet, AnwBl, 10, pp. 963–965.
Kuehn, R. & Santacroce, D. A. (2017) The 2016-17 Survey of Applied Legal Education. Center for the Study of Applied Legal Education (CSALE) (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).
Lee. J. (2009) Conflicting views on court interpreting examined through surveys of legal professionals and court interpreters, Interpreting, 11(1), pp. 35-56.
Mikkelson, H. (2000) Introduction to Court Interpreting (Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing).
Monteoliva, E. (2018) The Last Ten Years of Legal Interpreting Research. A Review of Research in the Field of Legal Interpreting, Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, 5(1), pp. 38-61.
Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C. & Seewagen, R. (eds.) (2005) Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press).
Mulayim, S , Lai, M & Norma, C (2014) Police Investigative Interviews and Interpreting: Context, Challenges, and Strategies (Boca Raton: CRC Press).
Pöllabauer, S. (2004) Interpreting in asylum hearings: Issues of role, responsibility and power, Interpreting, 6(2), pp. 143–180.
Pöchhacker, F. & Kold, W. (2009). Interpreting for the Record. A Case Study of Asylum Review Hearings In: & The Critical Link 5: Quality in Interpreting: a Shared Responsibility (119–134.
Ortega Herraez, J. M. & Foulquie Rubio, A.I. (2008) Interpreting in police settings in Spain: Service providers' and interpreters' perspectives, In: Garcés, V. & Martin, A. (eds.) Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and dilemmas (John Benjamins), pp.123-143.
Rekosh, E. (2005) The development of clinical legal education: A global perspective – international experience, the history of legal clinics, In: Łomowski, D. (ed.) The Legal Clinics. The Idea, Organization, Methodology (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck), pp. 43–51.
Rennert, S. (2018) Introduction, In: Rennert, S & Weißenböck, C. (eds.) Legal Clinic Report. Development and Current State of Transcultural Legal Clinics. (Vienna: University of Vienna), pp. 1-4.
Romano, M. C. (2016) Appendix A: The history of legal clinics in the US, Europe and around the world, In: Bartoli, C. (ed.) Legal Clinics in Europe: for a Commitment of Higher Education in Social Justice (Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche: Università degli Studi di Palermo), pp. 27–40.
Raquel De P. R. & Perez, I. (2014) Interpreting and Translating in Public Service Settings (London: Routledge).
Salaets, H. & Balogh K. (2015) A CO-Minor-IN/QUEST: Improving interpreter-mediated pre-trial interviews with minors, TRANS: revista de traductologia, 19(1), pp. 57-76.
Wadensjö, C. (1998) Interpreting as Interaction (London-New York: Longman).
Wizner, S (2002) The Law School Clinic: Legal Education in the Interests of Justice, Fordham Law Review, 70(5), pp. 1929-1937.
Zielinska, E. (2005) Clinical education as a nucleus for the reform of legal education in Poland, In: Łomowski, D. (ed.) The Legal Clinics. The Idea, Organization, Methodology. (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck), pp. 14–15.
Zakon o kazenskem postopku – Criminal Procedure Act (Uradni list RS, št. 32/12 – uradno prečiščeno besedilo, 47/13, 87/14, 8/16 – odl. US, 64/16 – odl. US, 65/16 – odl. US in 66/17 – ORZKP153,154).
Zakon o sodnih izvedencih, sodnih cenilcih in sodnih tolmačih – Court experts, certified appraisers and court interpreters Act (Uradni list RS, št. 22/18).
