Razmejitev in korelacija civilnih in upravnih sodnih postopkov: problemi in merila v zvezi s klasifikacijo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4335/18.2.335-348(2020)Ključne besede:
upravni sodni postopki, civilni sodni postopek, relacija avtoritete in hierarhije, merila za razmejitev, razmejitev postopkovPovzetek
Ta prispevek se posveča problemu razmejitve in korelacije civilnih in upravnih postopkov. Cilj raziskave je opredeliti jasna merila za razmejitev civilnih in upravnih sodnih postopkov z namenom izboljšanja učinkovitosti civilnih in upravnih zakonodajnih uredb pri reševanju sporov, povezanih s kršenjem pravic, svoboščin in zakonitih interesov posameznikov. Raziskava temelji na hipotezi, da je obseg odnosov v javni upravi širši od obsega odnosov, ki jih urejajo norme upravnega prava. Problem klasifikacije v študiji je obravnavan v kontekstu opredelitve vrste postopkov (upravnih ali civilnih). Pri tem so nam primeri s sodišč splošne pristojnosti služili kot raziskovalna baza. Avtorica predlaga nekaj modelov meril za razmejitev upravnih in civilnih sodnih postopkov na podlagi pravne klasifikacije med stranmi v postopku, kot tudi na podlagi značaja tožbe podanih zahtevkov. Slednje bi v prihodnosti lahko vodilo k oblikovanju novih, bolj natančnih metod uporabe upravnih norm, in k zmanjšanju števila precedensov za nepravilne postopke.
Literatura
Asimow, M. (2015) Five Models of Administrative Adjudication, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 63(1), pp. 3-32, https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2015.0001.
Balashov, A. N. (2017) Active role of the court in the accomplishment of the objectives of the administrative legal proceeding, Court administrative official, 2, pp. 33-38.
Barlow, A. (2017) Administrative Law and Human Rights Standards in Legal Aid: An Overview with Examples from Finland and England & Wales, European Public Law, 23(1), pp. 165-191.
Barnett, K. (2015) Against Administrative Judges, University of California, Davis, Law Review, 49, pp. 1643-1718.
Bartley, W. (2014) Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Amendment Act 2014, Planning News, 40(6), p. 18.
Bocharova, N. (2016) Party autonomy in administrative (judicial) proceedings, Brics Law Journal, 1, pp. 153-163.
Bolotin, V. (2014) Features of administrative law systems and sources of administrative law in foreign countries. Bulletin of state and municipal management, 2-1.
Bromberg, L. (2017) The extent and intensity of insider trading enforcement – an international comparison, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 17(1), pp. 73-110, https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2016.1223952.
Dascalopoulou-Livada, P. & Kolliopoulos, A. (2017) The Kiev Civil Liability Protocol and the Interaction between Civil and Administrative Liability Regimes, International Community Law Review, 19(4-5), pp. 518-550, https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341361.
Drapkin, R.T. (1999) Protecting the Rights of the Mentally Disabled in Administrative Proceedings, The Catholic Lawyer, 39(4), pp. 317-352.
Ferents, O. (2011) Practice of delimitation of civil and administrative jurisdiction of courts, Visnyk of Lviv University. Law series, 52, pp. 203-210.
Fox-Decent, E., Pless, A. (2017) The Charter and Administrative Law Part I: Procedural Fairness, In: Flood, C. & Sossin, L. (eds) Administrative law in context, 3rd ed. (Toronto: Emond).
Galetta, A. & De Hert, P. (2015) The Proceduralisation of Data Protection Remedies under EU Data Protection Law: Towards a More Effective and Data Subject-oriented Remedial System?, Review of European Administrative Law, 8(1), pp. 125-151.
Haana, E., Kediac, S., Kohb, K. & Rajgopald, Sh. (2015) The revolving door and the SEC’s enforcement outcomes: Initial evidence from civil litigation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(2-3), pp. 65-96.
Heidari, S. (2017) Adversarial principle in the administrative adjudication with emphasis on the procedure of administrative justice tribunal, Legal Studies - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Of Shiraz University, 7(2), pp. 83-116.
Ivanov, A. (2007) Administrative law of foreign countries (Tutorial. Moscow).
Laverne, J. & Baglay, S. (2013) The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes Global Perspectives (Milton Park: Routledge).
Maistrenko, L. & Romanyuk, Y. (2017) Problems of delimiting administrative jurisdiction from civil jurisdiction when solving land disputes, Law of Ukraine, 8, pp. 83-99.
Majewski, K. (2017). General principles of Code of Administrative Court Proceedingss after amendment of 2017, Roczniki Administracji i Prawa, 17, pp. 165-182.
Maleshin, D. (2015) Chief Editor's Note on the New Russian Code of Administrative Court Proceedings, Russian Law Journal, 3(4), pp. 5-6.
Mateykovich, M. S. (2017) Protection of human rights and liberties in the administrative proceeding, Law of Russia, 1, pp. 27-29.
McEvoy, K. & Sage-Jacobson, S. (2015) CATs: Gains or losses for access to justice? SACAT and public housing appeals. AIAL Forum, 82, pp. 40-54.
Migachev, Y., Popov, L. & Tikhomirov, S. (2019) Administrative Law of the Russian Federation. Textbook for Academic Bachelorship”. 5th edition, revised and supplemented (Moscow. Urait publishing house).
Mikhaleva, N. V. (2012) Problems of delimiting of jurisdictional powers of general jurisdiction courts and arbitration courts and the criteria of their definition, Actual problems of the Russian Law, 4, pp. 181-205.
Nelson, K. (2016) The Constitutionality of Civil Forfeiture, The Yale Law Journal, 125(8), pp. 2446-2460.
Nemtseva, V. B. (2016) Correlation problems of civil and administrative legal proceedings in the courts of general jurisdiction, Civil Procedure Newsletter, 1, pp. 190-208.
Perlingeiro, R. & Sommermann, K.-P. (2014) Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction: English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish Versions (Niterói: Editora da UFF).
Perlingeiro, R. (2016) A Historical Perspective on Administrative Jurisdiction in Latin America: Continental European Tradition versus U.S. Influence, British Journal of American Legal Studies, 5(1), pp. 241-289, http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i1.43658.
Peshkova, Т. V. (2014) Administrative legal proceedings in the general jurisdiction court: comparative and legal analysis of the regulations of the civil procedure code of the Russian Federation and the draft law “The code of administrative court of the Russian Federation, Legal notes, 4(27), pp. 58-65.
Rossinskaya, H. R. (2014) The Code of Administrative Court Proceedings and problems of unification of judicial and expert activity legislation, Administrative law and process, 2, pp. 23-28.
Sakhnova, T. (2014) Civil Process Course. 2nd edition, revised and supplemented (Moscow. Statute).
Savino, M. (2015) What if global administrative law is a normative project?, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(2), pp. 492-498. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov024.
Silvestri, E. (2016) Administrative justice in Italy, Brics Law Journal, 3(2), pp. 67-79.
Slyder, L. (2017) Rape in the Civil and Administrative Contexts: Proposed Solutions to Problems in Tort Cases Brought by Rape Survivors, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 68(2), pp. 543-601.
The Code of Administrative Court Proceedings of the Russian Federation (2015), available at: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102380990 (June 10, 2019)
The Federal Tort Claims Act (2019) available at: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part6/chapter171&edition=prelim (June 10, 2019).
The Housing Code of the Russian Federation (2004), available at: http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102090645 (June 10, 2019).
Tsindeliani, I. A. (2015) The Russian System of Financial Law, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2 S4), p. 47, https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s4p47.
Veresha, R. V. (2016) Mistake of Criminal Law and Its Influence on the Classification of Crime, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), pp. 8017-8025.
Xie, X. (2017) On the administrative litigation and reconciliation system in China, 3rd International Conference on Social Science, Management and Economics, SSME 2017, May 13-14, 2017, Guangzhou, China, https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/ssme2017/12933.
Zenin, I. (2015) Civil law. Textbook for Academic Bachelorship. 17th edition, revised and supplemented (Moscow. Urait publishing house).
