Spreminjanje odnosa do teritorialne reforme občin – Primer celinske Norveške

Avtorji

  • Ulla Higdem Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences
  • Hans Christian Høyer Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences
  • Erik Neslein Mønness Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences
  • Jon Helge Lesjø Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/18.2.271-292(2020)

Ključne besede:

združevanje občin, teritorialne reforme, odnos do državljanov, pričakovane posledice, Norveška

Povzetek

Odnos ljudi s celinskega dela Norveške do reforme za združevanje občin v obdobju od 2013 do 2018 postaja bolj pozitiven. Večina ne podpira trenutne reforme, kljub temu pa je v tem kratkem obdobju prišlo do precejšnjih sprememb. Zdi se, da te spremembe niso posledica novih in bolj pozitivnih mnenj glede rezultatov in koristi reform. Nasprotno, večina je bila bolj kritična glede pričakovanih posledic reforme za združevanje v večje občine. Spremembe smo tako razumeli kot vrsto ‘resignacije’ ljudi do pritiskov nacionalne vlade za reformo in do splošnih sprememb v njihovem okolju. Več državljanov ocenjuje, da so pozitiven gospodarski razvoj občin in večja lokalna pristojnost koristni učinki združevanja, kar podpira našo trditev. Reforma bo verjetno v vsakem primeru dohitela lokalne enote, odnos državljanov pa se prilagaja njihovim pričakovanjem glede razvoja dogodkov v naslednjih letih.

Literatura

Calciolari, S., Cristofoli, D. & Macciò, L. (2013) Explaining the reactions of Swiss municipalities to the 'Amalgamation wave', Public Management Review, 15(4), pp. 563-583.

Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. & Røvik, K. A. (2015) Organisasjonsteori for offentlig sektor (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).

Ebinger, F., Kuhlmann, S. & Bogumil, J. (2019) Territorial reforms in Europe: effects on administrative performance and democratic participation, Local Government Studies, 45(1), pp. 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1530660.

Grenwood, R., Oliviver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (2008) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (London: Sage).

Hall, P. A. & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, Political Stuidies, 44(5), pp. 936-957.

Hardin R. (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness (New York: Russel Sage Foundation).

Hellevik, O. (2016) Extreme nonresponse and response bias, Quality & Quantity, 50(5), pp. 1969-1991, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0246-5.

Higdem, U., Lesjø, J. H., Mønness, E. & Høyer, H. C. (2016) Større kommuner og fylker? Reflektert syn blant innbyggerne, og konklusjonen er nei, Fagbladet Samfunn og Økonomi, 1, pp. 9-28.

Høyer, H. C. & Mønness, E. N. (2016) Trust in public institutions – spillover and bandwidth, Journal of Trust Research, 6(2), pp. 151-166, https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2016.1156546.

Ipos-MMI (2013) Norsk Monitor - En sosiokulturell studie, available at: http://ipsos-mmi.no/Norsk-Monitor (October 12, 2019).

Jacobsen, D. I. (2004) Holdninger til endring i kommunestruktur: En nyansering av Rose og Pettersen, Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 20, pp. 414-420.

Johnsen, Å. & Klausen, J. E. (2006) Kommunesammenslåingers politiske økonomi. En analyse av velgeratferd i rådgivende folkeavstemninger, Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 22, pp. 22-45.

KantarTNS (2018) Norsk gallup, available at: https://kantar.no/ (October 12, 2019).

Kushner, J. & Siegel, D. (2003) Effect of Municipal Amalgamations in Ontario on Political Representation and Accessibility, Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, 36(5), pp. 1035-1051.

March, J. G.ž, & Olsen, J. P. (1995) Democratic Governance (New York: The Free Press).

Poel, D. H. (2000) Amalgamation Perspectives: Citizen Responses to Municipal Consolidation, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 23(1), pp. 31-48.

Rokkan, S. (1987) Stat, nasjon, klasse (5 ed.) (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).

Rose, L., Klausen, J. E. & Winsvold, M. (2017) Holdninger til kommunereform: Hva er utslagsgivende?, In: S. Jo & D. A. Christensen (eds) Lokalvalget 2015 - et valg i kommunereformens tegn? (Oslo: Abstract forlag AS), pp. 267 - 300.

Rose, L. & Pettersen, P. A. (2003). Holdninger til endringer i kommunestruktur: To preferanser, to rasjonaliteter?, Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 19, pp. 240-275.

Rose, L. & Pettersen, P. A. (2005) Endringer i kommunestrukturen. Hva skiller motstanderne fra de velvillige?, In: Saglie, J. & Bjørklund, T. (eds) Lokalvalg og lokalt folkestyre (Oslo: Gyldendal Akadmisk), pp. 288-318.

Ryan, R., Hastings, C., Grant, B., Lawrie, A., Ní Shé, É. & Wortley, L. (2016) The Australian Experience of Municipal Amalgamation: Asking the Citizenry and Exploring the Implications, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(3), pp. 373-390, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12182.

Sentio (2014) Sentio Research, available at: http://www.sentio.no/ (October 12, 2019).

Swianiewicz, P. (2018) If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? – Ten years later, Local Government Studies, 44(1), pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1403903.

Verhoeven, I. & Duyvendak, J. W. (2016) Enter emotions. Appealing to anxiety and anger in a process of municipal amalgamation, Critical Policy Studies, 10(4), pp. 468-485, https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1032990.

Prenosi

Objavljeno

2020-04-26

Številka

Letn. 18 Št. 2 (2020)

Rubrika

Article

Kako citirati

Spreminjanje odnosa do teritorialne reforme občin – Primer celinske Norveške. (2020). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 18(2), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.4335/18.2.271-292(2020)