Vpliv občin na učinkovitost lokalnih akcijskih skupin pri pridobivanju subvencij za projekte na Hrvaškem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4335/18.1.35-52(2020)Ključne besede:
lokalna akcijska skupina, lokalni razvoj, učinkovitost LAS, subvencije za projekte, HrvaškaPovzetek
Lokalne akcijske skupine (LAS) so trisektorska telesa, v katerih gospodarski in civilni sektor v partnerstvu z javnim sektorjem koristi sredstva politike EU za razvoj podeželja. V takem decentraliziranem pristopu k lokalnemu razvoju, ki ga vodi skupnost, obstaja tveganje za čezmerno vmešavanje občin in ogrozitev načel razvoja od spodaj navzgor. Temeljna predpostavka, po kateri vodilni javni sektor skuša opravičiti sebe kot telo z boljšo upravno sposobnostjo, ki lahko pomaga lokalnim akcijskim skupinam, da pridobijo in črpajo subvencije, je v tem prispevku statistično preverjena. Primer Hrvaške je pokazal, da »občinizacija« lokalnih partnerstev ni utemeljena, saj povečanje deleža javnih partnerjev v članstvu zmanjšuje učinkovitost lokalnih akcijskih skupin pri pridobivanju subvencij za projekte, obenem pa občine, ki izkazujejo večjo sposobnost črpanja sredstev skozi večji delež sredstev EU v svojih proračunih, ne kažejo prenosa pozitivnih učinkov na lokalne akcijske skupine, članice katerih so.
Literatura
Argiolas, G., Cabras, S., Dessì, C, & Floris, M. (2009) Building innovative models of territorial governance, Journal of Place Management and Development, 2(3), pp. 178–210.
Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016) Empowering Local Action through Neo Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England, Sociologia Ruralis, 56(3), pp. 427-449.
CEC (2005) Council Regulation No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, J., Razafimahefa, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017) The Leader Programme as a Model of Institutional Transfer: Learning from Its Local Implementation in France and Lithuania, European Countryside, 9(2), pp. 317-341.
Croatian LEADER Network, LEADER, available at: http://www.lmh.hr/leader-clld/leader (July 2, 2018).
Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016) The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland, European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), pp. 56-68.
Esparcia, J., Escribano, J. & Serrano, J. J. (2015) From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER Local Action Groups in Spain, Journal of Rural Studies, 42, pp. 29-42.
European Commission (2006) The LEADER approach (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
European Court of Auditors (2010) Implementation of the LEADER Approach for Rural Development, Special Report No. 5 (Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union).
Farrell G., Thirion S. (2005) Social capital and rural development: from win–lose to win–win with the LEADER initiative, In: Schmied D. (ed) Winning and Losing: The Changing Geography of Europe’s Rural Areas (Ashgate, Aldershot).
Halamska M. (2011) Sceny rozwoju lokalnego w Polsce: dekoracje i aktorzy, Wieś i Rolnictwo, 4(153), pp. 103–120.
High C. & Nemes G. (2007) Social Learning in LEADER: Exogenous, Endogenous and Hybrid Evaluation in Rural Development, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), pp. 103-119.
HMRR - Hrvatska mreža za ruralni razvoj (2017) Hrvatski LAG-ovi, available at: http://www.hmrr.hr/hr/leader/hrvatski-lagovi/ (February 14, 2018).
Knieć W. (2007) Władza w LGD, Kwartalnik Leader+, 4, pp. 18–19.
Kovach, I. (2000) LEADER, a new social order, and the central eand East-European countries, Sociolgia Ruralis, 40(2), pp. 181-189.
Kovach, I., Kucerova, E. (2006) The project class in central Europe: the Czech and Hungarian cases, Sociologia Ruralis 46(1), pp. 3-21.
Lacquement, G. & Raynal, J. (2013) Acteurs et ressources du développement local en Allemagne orientale : le territoire rural au prisme des projets du programme européen LEADER, Annales de géographie, 692(4), pp. 393-421.
Lopolito, A., Nardone, G. & Sisto, R. (2011) Towards a comprehensive evaluation of local action groups in LEADER programmes, New Medit, 10(1), pp. 43-49.
Łukasz Sykała, L., Dej, M. & Wolski, O. (eds) (2015) The LEADER Method. Transferring Experience of the Visegrad Group Countries to Georgia (Krakow: Institute of Urban Development).
Ministry of Agriculture (2014) Rural Development Programme of the Republic of Croatia for the Period 2014-2020, available at https://ruralnirazvoj.hr/files/documents/Programme_2014HR06RDNP001_6_1_hr.pdf (February 10, 2019).
O'Keeffe, B. (2009) Regional and Local Devolution in Ireland - the Potential of LEADER Partnerships to Provide Municipal Government, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 7(3), pp. 257-269.
Ott, K., Bronić, M., Petrušić, M. & Stanić, B. (2016) Budget transparency in Croatian counties, cities and municipalities (November 2015–March 2016), Newsletter: povremeno glasilo Instituta za javne finacije, 17(108), pp. 1-11.
Ott, K., Bronić, M., Petrušić, M. & Stanić, B. (2018) Budget transparency in Croatian counties, cities and municipalities (November 2017-March 2018), Newsletter: povremeno glasilo Instituta za javne finacije, 19(115), pp. 1-14.
Ray C., (2000), Endogenous socio-economic development in the European Union – issues of evaluation, Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4), pp.447-458.
Ray C., (2006) Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU, In: Cloke P., Marsden T. & Mooney, P. (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, (London: Sage).
Teilmann, K. A. & Thuesen, A. A. (2014) Important Types of LAG–Municipality Interaction When Collaborating on Rural Development: Lessons from Danish LEADER LAGs, International Journal of Rural Management, 10(1), pp. 21-45.
Vrabková I. & Šaradín P. (2017) The technical efficiency of local action groups: a Czech Republic case study, Acta Universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(3), pp. 1065-1074.
Zajda, K. (2014) Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the social capital concept, Eastern European Countryside, 20(1), pp. 73-97.
