Velikost in demokracija pod drobnogledom: Kritična razprava o domnevnem kompromisu med zmožnostjo reševanja težav in sodelovanjem

Avtorji

  • Asbjørn Røiseland Nord University, Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Signy I Vabo University of Oslo, Institute of Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.285-298(2019)

Ključne besede:

lokalna raven upravljanja, učinkovitost državljanov, sodelovanje državljanov, zmogljivost sistema, zmožnost upravljanja

Povzetek

Klasična literatura o velikosti in demokraciji trdi, da obstaja kompromis med priložnostmi za široko sodelovanje državljanov in zmožnostjo skupnosti za učinkovito obvladovanje izzivov, s katerimi se sooča njihova okolica. Kot posledica tega manjše politične enote plemenitijo demokracijo, večje enote pa krepijo zmožnost upravljanja. Trdimo, da je v luči nedavnih prispevkov o demokratičnem upravljanju, ki temelji na omrežju, kompromis vprašljiv, čeprav je lahko bistven v smislu osredotočanja na reprezentativne demokratične institucije. V članku je predstavljen ta argument in predlagani so elementi, ki bi jih bilo treba vključiti v pregledano teorijo velikosti občin.

Literatura

Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (2015) How does collaborative governance scale?, Policy and Politics, 43(3), pp. 315-329, http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14353344872935.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216-224.

Baldersheim, H. & Rose, L. E. (eds.) (2010) Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

Barber, B. R. (1984) Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age (Berkely, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press).

Barker, E. (1946) The Politics of Aristotle (Oxford: The Clarendon Press).

Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (2006) Introduction - Governance and democracy: Concepts and key issues, In: Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.) Governance and democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences (London: Routledge).

Blom‐Hansen, J., Houlberg, K. & Serritzlew, S. (2014) Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System, American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), pp. 790-803, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12096.

Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K. Serritzlew, S. & Treisman, D. (2016) ‘urisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation, American Political Science Review, 110(4), pp. 812-831.

Boyte, H. C. (2005) Reframing Democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics, Public Administration Review, 65(5), pp. 536-546.

Brewer, B. (2007) Citizen or consumer? Complaints handling in the public sector, International review of administrative sciences, 73, pp. 608-619.

Crozier, M. P. (2010) Rethinking systems: Configurations of Politics and Policy in contemporary governance, Administration & Society, 42(5), pp. 504-525.

Dahl, R. A. (19679 The City in the Future of Democracy, The American Political Science Review, 61(4), pp. 953-970, https://doi.org/10.2307/1953398.

Dahl, R. A. (1997) Toward Democracy: A journey (Barkley: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies Press).

Dahl, R. A. & Tufte, E. R. (1973) Size and Democracy (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

Dalton, R. J., Scarrow, S. E. & Cain, B. E. (2004) Advanced democracies and the new politics, Journal of Democracy, 15(1), pp. 124-138.

Denters, B., Goldsmith, M. J. Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., Rose, L. E. & Geurts, P. (2014) Size and local democracy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

Diamond, L. (2008) The spirit of democracy. The struggle to build free societies throughout the world (New York: Times Books).

Floridia, A. (2017) From participation to deliberation - a critical genealogy of deliberative democracy (Colchester, UK: ECPR Press).

Geissel, B. & Newton, K. (eds.) (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations. Curing the democratic malaise? (New York: Routledge).

Gendzwill, A. & Swianiewicz, P. (2016) Does Local Democracy Perform Better in Smaller Jurisdictions? Survey Evidence from Poland, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(4), pp.759-782.

Gilley, B. (2006) The meaning and measure of state legitimay: Results for 72 countries, European Journal of Political Research, 45, pp. 499-525.

Gustavsen, A., Røiseland, A. & Pierre,J. (2014) Procedure or performance? Assessing citizen's attitudes toward legitimacy in Swedish and Norwegian local government, Urban Research & Practice, 7(2), pp. 200-212.

Heinelt, H., Sweeting, D. & Getimis, P. (eds.) (2006) Legitimacy and urban governance. A Cross-national comparative study (London: Routledge).

Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2016) Achilles' heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures, Regulation & Governance, 10(4), pp. 301-313.

Kjellberg, F. (1985) Local Government Reorganization and the Development of the Welfare State, Journal of Public Policy, 5(2), pp. 215-239.

Klausen, J. E., Sweeting, D. & Howard, J. (2006) Community involvement and legitimation in urban governance: an empirical analysis, In: Heintel, H., Sweeting, D. & Getimis, P. (eds.) Legitimacy and urban governance. A Cross-national comparative study (London: Routledge).

Larssen, D. D. & Serritzlew, S. (2011) Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform, American Political Science Review, 105(2), pp. 238-258.

Lindgren, K-O. & Persson, T. (2010) Input and output legitimacy: synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey, Journal of European Public Policy, 4, pp. 449-67.

Nabatchi, T. & Leighninger, M. (2015) Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy (New Jersey: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Brand).

Newton, K. (1982) Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effect, effectiveness, and democracy in local government, Political Studies, 30, pp. 190-206.

Oates, W. E. (1999) An Essay on Fiscal Federalism, Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), pp. 1120-1149.

Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. & Warren, R. (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry, American Political Science Review, 55(4), pp. 831-842.

Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Painter, M. & Pierre, J. (eds.) (2005a) Challenges to state policy capacity - Global trends and comparative perspectives (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave).

Painter, M. & Pierre, J. (2005b) Unpacking policy capacity: Issues and themes, In: Painter, M. & Pierre, J. (eds.) Challenges to state policy capacity. Global trends and comparative perspectives (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2006) Governance, accountability and democratic legitimacy, In: Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.) Governance and democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences (London: Routledge).

Peters, B. G. (2011) Steering, rowing, drifting or sinking? Changing patterns of governance, Urban Research & Practice, 4(1), pp. 5-12.

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2004) Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain?, In: Backe, I. & Flinders, M. (eds.) Multilevel Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community (New York: Simon & Schuster).

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1981) Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relations (Farnborough: Gower).

Risse, T. (2006) Transnational governance and legitimacy, In: Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, Y. (eds) Governance and Democracy (London: Routledge), pp. 179–199.

Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2008) What is quality of government: A theory of impartial political institutions, Governance - an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 21(2), pp. 165-190.

Rothstein, B. (2010) Nycklarna till politisk legitimitet, In: Andersson, S., Bergh, A., Elingsson, G. O. & Sjölin, M. (eds.) Korruption, maktmissbruk och legitimitet (Stockholm: Norstedts).

Smith, G. (2009) Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Steiner, R., Kaiser, C., Tapscott, C. & Navarro, C. (2018) Is local always better? Strengths and limitations of local governance for service delivery, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), pp. 394-409, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-226.

Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2017) Strengthening interactive political leadership by designing arenas for collaborative policy innovation, PUPOL, Milton Keynes 5-7 April 2017.

Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2018) The democratizing impact of governance networks: From pluralization, via democratic anchorage, to interactive political leadership, Public administration, 96(2), pp. 1-16.

Swianiewicz, P. (ed.) (2010) Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe (Budapest: Open Society Institute).

Torfing, J. & Triantafillou, P. (eds.) (2011) Interactive policy making, metagovernance and democracy (Essex: ECPR Press).

Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. & Sørensen, E. (2012) Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. & Røiseland, A. (2017) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits and Ways forward, Administration and Society, 51(5), pp. 795-825.

Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V. & Tummers, L. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9), pp. 1333–1357.

Objavljeno

2019-04-30

Številka

Rubrika

Article

Kako citirati

Velikost in demokracija pod drobnogledom: Kritična razprava o domnevnem kompromisu med zmožnostjo reševanja težav in sodelovanjem. (2019). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(2), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.285-298(2019)