High Rents, Low Births: Exploring Fertility Responses to Housing Prices Via Ardl

Authors

  • ZHENGRONG CAI School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • RUSMAWATI BINTI SAID School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • WAN AZMAN SAINI WAN NGAH School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/22.2.64-70(2024)

Keywords:

ARDL model; Economic Sustainability; Fertility, Housing prices

Abstract

China experienced rapid population growth throughout the 1990s, but this trend began to stabilize by 2015. By 2017, the number of births had fallen below the number of deaths, marking the onset of negative population growth. This demographic shift presents significant macroeconomic challenges, including labor shortages and an increasing burden of elderly care. While fertility rates have declined, household consumption levels have continued to rise, with housing expenditures surpassing food to become the largest component of per capita spending. This study investigates whether rising housing prices have contributed to declining fertility rates in China. Using panel data from 31 provinces between 2003 and 2021, the analysis employs the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to examine the relationship between housing prices and fertility. The findings indicate that both increasing housing prices and the growth of the tertiary sector’s GDP exert a significant negative impact on fertility rates. Based on these results, the study recommends that policymakers consider measures to regulate housing prices and manage consumption growth as part of broader efforts to address the challenges associated with negative population growth.

References

Afonso, A., Fernandes, S. (2006). Measuring local government spending efficiency: Evidence for the Lisbon region. Regional Studies, 40 (1), 39-53.
Banker, Rajiv D., Charnes, A. Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Methods for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30 (9), 1078-1092.
Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 102-125, [online] Available at
http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/pe/pfma06/BarroEndogGrowthJPE88.pdf. [Accessed 2013].
Bowlin, W. F. (1998). Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The Journal of Cost Analysis, 15(2), 3-27.
Bradford, D. F., Malt, R. A., Oates, W. E. (1969). The Rising Cost of Local Public Services: Some Evidence and Reflections. National Tax Journal, XXII (2), 185-202.
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E., (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-44.
Cherchye L., De Rock, B., Hennebel, V. (2014). The economic meaning of Data Envelopment Analysis: A ‘behavioral’ perspective. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 48, 29-37.
Davis, M. L., Hayes, K. (1993). The demand for good government. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 148-152.
Deller, S. C., (1992). Production efficiency in local government: a parametric approach. Public Finance, 47, 32-44.
Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA. European Journal Of Operational Research, 132(2), 245-259.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120 (3), 253-290.
Fisher, R. C., (2007). State and Local Public Finance, Third Edition, Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western.
Kalirajan, K., Shand, R. (1999). Frontier production functions and technical efficiency measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13, 149-172.
Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497–532.
Liu, J. S., Lu, Y.Y.L., Lu, Wen-Min, Lin, Bruce J.Y. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41, 3–15.
Lovell Knox, C. (2000). Measuring efficiency in the public sector, in Blank, Jos L. T. (Ed.). Public Provision and Performance: Contributions from efficiency and productivity measurement, North Holland, Amsterdam, 23-53.
O’Sullivan, A., Sheffrin, S. M. (2003). Economics: Principles in action, Pearson Prentice Hall and The Wall Street Journal Classroom Edition.
Rhodes, E. L. (1980). Data envelopment analysis and related approaches for measuring the efficiency and decision – making units with an application to program follow through in U.S. education, PhD thesis.
Roman, M. M., Suciu, C. M. (2012). The Efficiency Analysis of R&D Activities by Using DEA, Studii şi Cercetări de Calcul Economic şi Cibernetică Economică, 46 (1-2), 4-18.
Rung-Wei, Po; Yuh-Yuan, Guh, Miin-Shen, Yang (2009). A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 276-284.
Sarkis, J. (2000). Preparing your data for DEA, Productivity Analysis in the Service Sector with Data Envelopment Analysis, Second Edition, Chapter 4.
Schwab, R. M., Oates, Wallace E. (1991). Community composition and the provision of local public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 44, 217-237.
Talluri, S. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: Models and Extensions. Decision Line, 8-11.
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5) A 416-424.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

High Rents, Low Births: Exploring Fertility Responses to Housing Prices Via Ardl. (2024). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 22(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.52152/22.2.64-70(2024)

Most read articles by the same author(s)