FROM "NODE TRANSFUSION" TO "NETWORK HEMATOPOIESIS": GOVERNANCE MECHANISM AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF RELATIVE POVERTY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL NETWORK —— EMPIRICAL RESEARCH BASED ON DYNAMIC SPATIAL DURBIN MODEL

Abstract

From the perspective of social network theory, the traditional "strong node-weak channel" governance model under the dual context of urbanization and digitalization in the postpoverty era exhibits four critical flaws: short-term economic compensation traps, structural marginalization risks, spatial imbalances in resource allocation, and lack of dynamic feedback mechanisms. Governance tools must transition from "node transfusion" to "network self-sustaining. " Using panel data from 147 districts and counties in China's CFPS (2010-2022), this study employs the dynamic spatial Durbin model to investigate the spatial mechanisms of node knowledge density, community interaction intensity, and resource allocation efficiency on network marginalization. A three-dimensional analytical framework of "node-network-space" is constructed, demonstrating that knowledge networks exhibit weak-link breakthrough effects, resource networks demonstrate group game repulsion, community networks possess spatial spillover mechanisms, and poverty subcultures feature complex transmission pathways that can be resolved within short cycles. The findings provide policy implications:

1. Enhance knowledge transfer capabilities and establish a cross-regional weak-link network; 2. Resolve group game dilemmas and develop innovative resource allocation mechanisms; 3. Quantify community interaction intensity to stimulate physical space synergy; 4. Innovate network monitoring systems and construct multidimensional spatial correlation indicators. This study transcends the limitations of static relationships in traditional social network analysis, extending social network theory to dynamic governance contexts. It effectively explains the "strong nodes-weak channels" paradox during poverty governance transitions, providing theoretical tools for dynamic governance of relative poverty in the post-poverty era.