Study on the Calculation Rules and their Application of Damages for Breach of Contract under Chinese Laws
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/800036Keywords:
damages formula; long-term contract; compensation for breach of contract; calculation of damages; disgorgementAbstract
Under the background of the market economy, the types of contracts are becoming more and more abundant, and the discussion about the application of the calculation rules of damages for breach of contract in different contract types is also increasing. The statistical analysis of China's judicial practice shows that the number of cases involving the claim for damages for breach of contract significantly differs under the influence of contract types, geographical distribution, and trial procedures. Implementing the IGPC of the China Civil Code represents the step towards the formulaic and standardized stage of China's calculation rules for breach of contract damages. Compared with the diversified research perspectives of overseas literature, China started relatively late in studying the formulaic rules for calculating damages for breach of contract. The existing literature mainly focuses on foundational theories and less on calculation methods and corresponding special rules. In China, the calculation of damages for breach of contract is based on the foundational principle of full compensation, and the rules of foreseeability, mitigation, certainty, etc, limit the damages. However, some rules need to be interpreted specially when applied in long-term contracts. According to the circumstances of the cases, the existing calculation rules deal with the calculation of expectation or reliance interests. The calculation rules usually consist of four elements: loss of value, other losses, avoided expenses, and losses avoided. All the rules could be interpreted into three types of formulas: general formula, special formula, and miscellaneous formula.
References
Hodgson, G. M. . (2017). Karl Polanyi on economy and society: a critical analysis of core. Review of Social Economy 25.
Atiyah, P. S. .(1986). Contracts, Promises, and the Law of Obligations. Essays on contract. Oxford University Press.
Dagan, H. and Heller M. . (2017). The choice theory of contracts. Cambridge University Press.
Joskow, P. L. . (1987). Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: Empirical evidence from coal markets. The American Economic Review.
Sun Weifei (2022). Commentary to Art. 584 of the China Civil Code (scope of damages for breach of contract) . Jiao Da Law 1.
Landes, W. M. and Posner, R.A. . (1987). The economic structure of tort law. Harvard University Press.
Fried, C. . (1981). Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Harvard University Press.
Zhao Gang . (2010). Application of mitigation rule and calculation of damages for breach of contract. Social Science Journal Compilation 3.
Li Chengliang. (2021). Conditions and consequences of using compensation instead of performance. Law 10.
Yu yunheng. (2015). Reliance interests compensation in breach of contract. Global Law Review 37 (03).
Sun Liangguo. (2024). The Chinese landscape of substitute transactions. Finance and Economics Law 4.
Xu Jiangang. (2024). Value basis and regulation expression of property damages calculation. Law 6.
Zhang Jiayong. (2024). The coordination and improvement of the rules for the calculation of available interests - taking Art. 60-62 of the IGPC of the China Civil Code as the core. Journal of law 45 (06).
Xie Hongfei. (2024). The system positioning and application limitations of the right of disgorgement for the interests of breach of contract. Tsinghua Law 18 (01).
Yang Wanming, Liu Guixiang, Lin Wenxue and etc. . (2024). Explanation of key points of the IGPC of the China Civil Code. Application of Law 1.
Farnsworth, E. A. . (1990). Contracts (2nd ed.). Aspen Publishers.
Macneil, I. R. . (1977). Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Nw. UL Rev. 72.
Williamson, O. E. . (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
Posner, R. A. . (2014). Economic analysis of law (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Klein, B. and Leffler, K.B. . (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of political Economy 89 (4).
Korman, J. . (2018). The measure of damages for breach of a construction contract where there is no economic loss: an examination and evaluation of the law in England and Australia. Building and Construction Law 34 (3).
Issa, M. R. . (2015). Damages and compensation in case of breach of contract. International Journal of Social Science Research 3(1).
Wang Zejian. (2018). Damages. Peking University Press.
Webb, C. . (2006). Performance and compensation: an analysis of contract damages and contractual obligation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1).
Cooter, R. and Eisenberg, M. A. .(1985). Damages for breach of contract. Calif. L. Rev. 73.
Xu Bohan. (2024). Defending for the principle of full compensation: the value loss and return path of China's damage compensation system. Research on China maritime law 3.
Yang Daixiong. (2022). Pocket edition of commentaries on the China Civil Code. China Democratic Legal Publishing House.
Cooter, R. and Eisenberg, M. A. .(1985). Damages for breach of contract. Calif. L. Rev. 73.
Washington, G. T. . (1932). Damages in contract at common Law. LQ Rev. 48.
Sun Liangguo. (2011). Study of the foreseeability rule in Contract Law. Journal of the National Academy of Prosecutors 19 (06).
Wu Xingzheng. (2012). Rethinking and reconstruction of the rules of compensation for available interests in Contract Law - starting from the empirical study of the application of Art. 113 of Contract Law of the People's Republic of China. Law and business studies 29 (02).
Pothier, R. J. . (1853). A Treatise on the Law of Obligations, or Contracts: 2. Robert H. Small.
Li Yongjun. (1999). Principles of Contract Law. People's Public Security University of China Press.
Pan Weilin. (2017). Establish a uniform rule of foreseeability in the law of damages. Jurist 4.
Mao Ruizhao. (2003). The rule of foreseeability in Contract Law. China Law 4.
Ye Jinqiang. (2013). The concretization of the judgment criteria of foreseeability - the interpretation path of the proviso of paragraph 1 of Art. 113 of the Contract Law. Legal science 31 (03).
Li Liang. (2021). A dynamic system of judgment criteria for foreseeability of breach of contract damages. Civil and Commercial Law Review 72 (01).
Wang Liming. (2000). Liability for Breach of Contract: Revised edition. China University of Political Science and Law Press．
Cohen, G. M. .(2008). The Fault that Lies Within Our Contract Law. Mich. L. Rev. 107.
Sun Liangguo and Yu Zhongchun. (2009). Study of intentional breach of contract. Legal system and social development 15 (06).
Yao Mingbin. Commentary to Art. 113, paragraph 1 (scope of damages for breach of contract) of the Contract Law. Jurist 3.
Feldman, S.W. . (2009). Autonomy and Accountability in the Law of Contracts. Drake L. Rev. 58.
The Second Civil Trial Division and Research Office of the Supreme People's Court. (2023). Judicial interpretation and application of the Supreme People's Court Civil Code contract general rules. People's Court Press.
Cui Jianyuan. (2024). The scope and calculation of damages for breach of contract - Commentary on Art. 60 to 62 of the IGPC of the China Civil Code. Tsinghua Law 1.
Treitel, G. H. . (2003). The Law of Contract (11th ed.). Thomson Sweet & Maxwell.
Eisenberg, M. A. . (2018). Foundational Principles of Contract Law. Oxford University Press.
Cui Jianyuan. (2024). The rule of mitigation. Yunnan social sciences 1.
Xie Hongfei and Zhu Guangxin. (2020). Commentary to the China Civil Code: General Rules of contract 2. China Legal Publishing House.
Han Shiyuan. (2018). Comments on the Contract Law (4th ed.) . Law press.
Liu Chengwei. (2013). Rules for the determination of losses of available interests in breach of contract. Legal research 35 (02).
Farnsworth, E. A. and Young, W. F. Young. (1995). Cases and materials on contracts (5th ed.). Foundation Press.
Brown, M., Falk, A. and Fehr, E. . (2002). Contractual incompleteness and the nature of market interactions. available at SSRN 307843.
Eisenberg, M. A. . (1999). Why there is no law of relational contracts. Nw. UL Rev. 94.
Fuller, L. L. and Perdue, W. R. . (1936). The reliance interest in contract damages: 1. The Yale Law Journal 46 (1).
Sun Liangguo. (2017). Damages and restrictive rules for damages. Juristic case research 2.
Twining, W. . (2012). Karl Llewellyn and the realist movement. Cambridge University Press.
Sun Liangguo. (2024). Qualitative determination and applicable circumstances of disgorgement in breaching of contracts - Remarking on Art. 62 of the IGPC of the China Civil Code. Seeker 4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
