Digital Information Infrastructure and the Growth of Chinese SMEs: An Institutional Co-construction Approach

Authors

  • Qiuya Ma Faculty of Business, Hospitality, Accounting and Finance (FOBHAF), MAHSA University, Malaysia
  • Danqing Wu Faculty of Business, Hospitality, Accounting and Finance (FOBHAF), MAHSA University, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/22.3.72-79(2024)

Keywords:

Entrepreneurial Ecosystem • Institutional Support • SME Innovation • Information Infrastructure

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates how digital information infrastructure (DII) drives the growth and innovation of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) through an institutional co-construction approach, examining the mechanisms by which information and communication technology enhances SMEs' participation in global value chains (GVCs).Design/Methodology/Approach: A dynamic panel model was employed for empirical analysis, exploring the relationship between DII adoption and SME performance indicators from 2020 to 2024. Structural equation modeling was utilized to analyze pathways through which the integration of informatization and industrialization affects value-added capabilities across different manufacturing value chain segments.Findings: Results demonstrate that DII significantly enhances SMEs' competitive positioning in GVCs through dual pathways: first, digital technologies optimize internal management and decision-making processes (path coefficient=0.65), facilitating product and service diversification; second, DII improves information transparency and reduces transaction costs (average reduction of 23.7%), strengthening supply chain collaboration. The highest combined effects were observed in marketing (47.7%) and quality control (40.6%) activities.Conclusion: The institutional co-construction of digital infrastructure and enterprise innovation creates a virtuous cycle that accelerates the transformation of the manufacturing sector, exhibiting a two-quarter lag before maximum benefits materialize and helping SMEs overcome resource constraints and low-end lock-in challenges.Practical Implications: These findings provide empirical support for policymakers to enhance targeted infrastructure development through technology adoption incentives, innovation vouchers, and digital ecosystem incubators that address the specific developmental stages and technological readiness of SMEs.

References

Burger, A. and Kotnik, P.: Strokovna analiza kot podlaga za Strategijo pametne specializacije. Ljubljana, 2014. Available at: http://www.svrk.gov.si/fileadmin/svrk.gov.si/pageuploads/Dokumenti_za_objavo_na_vstopni_strani/Smart_specialization_metodologija_Final.pdf

FIDEA SIA: The assessment of industry growth potential. Riga, 2014. Available at: http://www.svrk.gov.si/fileadmin/svrk.gov.si/pageuploads/SPS_predstavitve/Fidea_2014_-_SI_Industry_Growth_Potential.pdf

GODC (Government Office for Development and Cohesio Policy): Slovenia’s Smart Specialization Strategy. Ljubljana, 2015.Available at:
http://www.svrk.gov.si/fileadmin/svrk.gov.si/pageuploads/SPS_predstavitve/S4_dokument_2015_october_eng_clean_lekt.pdf

Jaklič, A. et al.. Evalvacija izvajanja politike podjetništva in konkurenčnosti v bdobju 2004-2009. Ljubljana, 2012. Available at:
http://www.mgrt.gov.si/fileadmin/mgrt.gov.si/pageuploads/DPK/CRPi_2010/Koncno_porocilo_CRP_konkurencnost.pdf

KUMAR, A., ŠLANDER, Sonja. The EU cohesion policy as part of the development policy in Slovenia. V: KANDŽIJA, Vinko (ur.). Absorption capacity of EU pre-accession programs in the Western Balkan countries Cemafi International, 2014,

Jaklič, A. et al.. Evalvacija izvajanja politike podjetništva in konkurenčnosti v bdobju 2004-2009. Ljubljana, 2012. Available at:
http://www.mgrt.gov.si/fileadmin/mgrt.gov.si/pageuploads/DPK/CRPi_2010/Koncno_porocilo_CRP_konkurencnost.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Digital Information Infrastructure and the Growth of Chinese SMEs: An Institutional Co-construction Approach. (2024). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 22(3), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.52152/22.3.72-79(2024)