Electronic Evidence Storage on Blockchain and Its Regulations in China: On Coupling of Law and Technology

Authors

  • Jixin Wei School of Law, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Zhihua Chen Faculty of Law, Wuhan University, Bayi Road 299, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Weilong Chen School of Law, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taizi Weilong Road, Macau 999078, China
  • Dingmao Cheng Faculty of Law, Anqing Normal University, Jixian North Road 1318, Anqing 246133, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/800069

Keywords:

Blockchain, Electronic Evidence, Blockchain Judicial Storage, Evidence Storage, Regulations

Abstract

Utilizing blockchain technology to preserve electronic evidence is the coupling and innovation of law and technology, with distinctive efficiency and security, and is a significant engine for China to attain the "Digital Rule of Law, Digital Justice". Based on the context of Digital Justice era, this paper explores blockchain storage technology from the perspective of the dilemma of conventional centralized storage of electronic evidence. In the wake of intensive discussions of its peculiar advantages, and characteristics, along with its legal and technical issues in practical application, we put forward a two-orientation coupling mechanism of law and technology, implementing a novel preservation pattern dominated by third-party preservation platforms and structuring a technical rule system for electronic evidence preservation on blockchain. Apart from establishing scientific and applicable rules for identifying blockchain evidence, it also proposes advisable suggestions for improving the effective supervision of electronic evidence preservation on blockchain in the judicial field, which relies on regulatory technology.  

Published

2025-08-01

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Electronic Evidence Storage on Blockchain and Its Regulations in China: On Coupling of Law and Technology. (2025). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.52152/800069