Public Policy Implications of ESG Performance on Corporate Credit Risk: Insights from the Merton Distance-to-Default Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/2896Keywords:
ESG, Environment, Social, Corporate Governance, Merton Distance-to-Default ModelAbstract
Against the backdrop of China's slowing economy, this paper studies the relationship between ESG performance of China's listed companies and default distance. This study employs panel data and multiple linear regression methods. The results indicate a positive relationship between aggregate ESG performance and corporate default distance. While environmental indicators do not have a significant correlation, social and corporate governance indicators show a positive correlation. In conclusion, enterprises with better ESG performance have a greater default distance. These findings contribute to the exploration of the relationship between ESG performance and the default distance of Chinese listed firms.
References
Ahmad, A., Muhammad, M., & Narullia, D. (2021). Corporate risk disclosure: the effect of corporate governance. Journal of Applied Managerial Accounting, 5(1), 101-113. [1]
Alkurdi, A., Hussainey, K., Tahat, Y., & Aladwan, M. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on risk disclosure: Jordanian evidence. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(1), 1-16. [2]
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial analysts journal, 74(3), 87-103. [3]
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186. [4]
Asimakopoulos, P., Asimakopoulos, S., & Li, X. (2023). The role of environmental, social, and governance rating on corporate debt structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 83, 102488. [5]
Bottazzi, G., Grazzi, M., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2011). Financial and economic determinants of firm default. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21, 373-406. [6]
Cheng, Q., & Ng, A. (2018). State ownership, governance and financial performance of Chinese state owned enterprises. Journal of Accounting, 8(1). [7]
Ding, X., Appolloni, A., & Shahzad, M. (2022). Environmental administrative penalty, corporate environmental disclosures and the cost of debt. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 129919. [8]
Du, M., Chai, S., Wei, W., Wang, S., & Li, Z. (2022). Will environmental information disclosure affect bank credit decisions and corporate debt financing costs? Evidence from China’s heavily polluting industries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 47661-47672. [9]
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233. [10]
Fung, B. (2014). The demand and need for transparency and disclosure in corporate governance. Universal Journal of Management, 2(2), 72-80. [11]
Greenwald, C. (2007). The importance of consistent and comparable ESG performance data. Internet: http://www. asset4. com/pdf/ASSET4-The-importance-of-consistent-and-comparable-ESG-performance-data. pdf, last access, 30, 2009. [12]
Gupta, J., Wilson, N., Gregoriou, A., & Healy, J. (2014). The value of operating cash flow in modelling credit risk for SMEs. Applied Financial Economics, 24(9), 649-660. [13]
He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W., & Liu, G. (2023). ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, 102550. [14]
Kanapickiene, R., & Spicas, R. (2019). Credit risk assessment model for small and micro-enterprises: The case of Lithuania. Risks, 7(2), 67. [15]
Kaźmierczak, M. (2022). A LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CSR AND ESG. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie(162). [16]
Lavin, J. F., & Montecinos-Pearce, A. A. (2022). Heterogeneous firms and benefits of ESG disclosure: Cost of debt financing in an emerging market. Sustainability, 14(23), 15760. [17]
Lim, H.-J., & Mali, D. (2024). Does market performance (Tobin’s Q) have a negative effect on credit ratings? Evidence from South Korea. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 31(1), 53-80. [18]
Lin, K. J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of accounting research, 13(1), 31-55. [19]
Lin, L.-W., & Milhaupt, C. J. (2017). Bonded to the state: A network perspective on China's corporate debt market. Journal of Financial Regulation, 3(1), 1-39. [20]
Luo, W., Guo, X., Zhong, S., & Wang, J. (2019). Environmental information disclosure quality, media attention and debt financing costs: Evidence from Chinese heavy polluting listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 268-277. [21]
Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., Ben Amar, W., & Mansour, S. (2023). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation. Corporate reputation review, 26(1), 1-18. [22]
Pan, W.-F., Wang, X., Wu, G., & Xu, W. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and sovereign credit risk. China Finance Review International, 11(3), 287-301. [23]
Peng, L. S., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in Shariah firms: agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 16(1). [24]
Qiu, B., & Cheng, B. (2022). Is a deleveraging policy effective? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 77, 471-480. [25]
Sherwood, M. W., & Pollard, J. (2023). Responsible investing: An introduction to environmental, social, and governance investments. Routledge. [26]
Shih, Y.-C., Wang, Y., Zhong, R., & Ma, Y.-M. (2021). Corporate environmental responsibility and default risk: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101596. [27]
Truong, T. T. T., & Kim, J. (2019). Do corporate social responsibility activities reduce credit risk? Short and long-term perspectives. Sustainability, 11(24), 6962. [28]
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. [29]
Zhang, M., He, Y., & Zhou, Z.-f. (2013). Study on the influence factors of high-tech enterprise credit risk: empirical evidence from China's listed companies. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 901-910. [30]
Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387. [31]
Zhou, H., Li, G., & Lin, W. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Spreads-An Empirical Study in Chinese Context. Annals of Economics & Finance, 17(1). [32]
Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 127. [33]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
