Democracy in Local Communities: Direct Election System versus Deliberation System in the Minangkabau Ethnicity in West Sumatra, Indonesia

Authors

  • Irawati Ph.D, Assistant Professor, Universitas Andalas, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Limau Manis's Campus, FISIP Building, Limau Manis, Padang, Indonesia
  • Utang Suwaryo Ph.D, Professor, Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Bukit Gado Utara Street, No. 25, 40135, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Affan Sulaeman Ph.D, Associate Professor, Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Bukit Gado Utara Street, No. 25, 40135, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Neneng Yani Yuningsih Ph.D, Associate Professor, Universitas Padjadjaran, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Bukit Gado Utara Street, No. 25, 40135, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/22.4.104-123(2024)

Keywords:

Minangkabau ethnicity, local community, deliberation, direct election, communitarian democracy

Abstract

This paper focuses on the dissonance between the values of the democracy of local communities and the liberal democracy of the Minangkabau community in West Sumatra, Indonesia. A direct election system is adopted to elect the leader of the Minangkabau community. However, a qualitative study shows that, culturally, the Minangkabau community chooses its leader through a clan-based deliberation system, relying on communal rather than individual representation. Adopting direct election with the one-person-one- vote principle to elect the community leader has instead been a source of conflict. The ambiguous understanding of the community members regarding the principles of individual and collective representation has given rise to the conflict. The institutionalisation of a clan-based deliberation system in the community is a solution to solve the conflict. This scholarly inquiry underscores that the Minangkabau ethnic group's democratic ethos fosters an environment conducive to communal deliberations, thereby sustaining their social cohesion and integration.

References

Azwar, W., Yunus, Y., Muliono, M., & Permatasari, Y. (2018). Nagari Minangkabau: The study of indigenous institutions in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 231-239. doi:10.21787/jbp.10.2018.231-239

Balasubramaniam, V. (2006). Strengthening ethnic identity consciousness and the role of tactical voting in multi-racial Malaysia. Asian Ethnicity, 7(1), 75-88. doi:10.1080/14631360500498536

Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Beissinger, M. R. (2008). A new look at ethnicity and democratization. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 85-97. doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0017

Bell, D. A. (2005). A communitarian critique of liberalism. Analyse & Kritik, 27(2), 215- 238. doi:10.1515/auk-2005-0201

Benhabib, S. (1994). Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy. Deutsche Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie, 43(1), 3-29. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8675.1994.tb00003.x

Benhabib, S. (Ed.). (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Biezeveld, R. (2007). The many roles of adat in West Sumatra. In J. S. Davidson & D. Henley (Eds.), The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics (pp. 223-243). New York, NY: Routledge.

Buehler, M. (2010). Decentralisation and local democracy in Indonesia: The marginalisation of the public sphere. In E. Aspinall & M. Mietzner (Eds.), Problems of democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, institutions and society (pp. 267-285). Singapore, Republic of Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

Chandra, K. (2005). Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 235-252. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050188

Crespy, A. (2014). Deliberative democracy and the legitimacy of the European Union: A reappraisal of conflict. Political Studies, 62(S1), 81-98. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12058

de Jong, P. E. D. J. (1980). Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan: Socio-political structure in Indonesia. Den Haag, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

Di Mauro, D., & Fiket, I. (2017). Debating Europe, transforming identities: Assessing the impact of deliberative poll treatment on identity. Italian Political Science Review, 47(3), 267-289. doi:10.1017/ipo.2016.26

Djamra, N. S. (2013). Nagari di titik nadir: Rapuhnya institusi sosial & kultural masyarakat Minangkabau. In B. R. Ahmad, Syaiful, Tamrin, Irawati, & A. Rusta (Eds.), Dari Desa ke Nagari: Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah di Sumatera Barat (pp, 1-20). Padang, Indonesia: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Andalas.

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Eifert, B., Miguel, E., & Posner, D. N. (2010). Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 494-510. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00443.x

Eko, S. (2005). Menggantang asap?: Kritik dan refleksi atas gerakan kembali ke nagari. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: IRE bekerja sama dengan Komisi Eropa. Eko, S., Barori, M., & Hastowiyono. (2017).

Desa Baru Negara Lama. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pascasarjana STPMD ‘APMD’.

Erb, M., & Sulistiyanto, P. (Eds.). (2009). Deepening democracy in Indonesia?: Direct elections for local leaders (Pilkada). Singapore, Republic of Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Fish, M. S., & Brooks, R. S. (2004). Does diversity hurt democracy?. Journal of Democracy, 15(1), 154-166. doi:10.1353/jod.2004.0009

Gherghina, S., Mokre, M., & Mișcoiu, S. (2021). Deliberative democracy, underrepresented groups and inclusiveness in Europe. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(5), 633-637. doi:10.1080/13511610.2021.1996975

Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Hadler, J. (2010). Sengketa tiada putus: Matriarkat, reformisme agama, dan kolonialisasi di minangkabau. Jakarta, Indonesia: Freedom Institute.

Haris, S. (2005) Desentralisasi & otonomi daerah: Desenralisaasi, demokratisasi & akuntabilitas pemerintahan daerah. Jakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Obor.

Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

Higashijima, M., & Nakai, R. (2016). Elections, ethnic parties, and ethnic identification in new democracies: Evidence from the Baltic States. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51, 124-146. doi:10.1007/s12116-015-9187-1

Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Houle, C., Park, C., & Kenny, P. D. (2018). The structure of ethnic inequality and ethnic voting. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 187-200. doi:10.1086/700200

Huat, C. B. (2004). Communitarian politics in Asia. London, UK: Routledge.

Huber, J. D. (2012). Measuring ethnic voting: Do proportional electoral laws politicize ethnicity?. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 986-1001. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 5907.2012.00601.x

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2003). Political culture and democracy: Analyzing cross-level linkages. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 61-79.

Kahin, A. (1999). Rebellion to integration: West Sumatra and the Indonesian polity, 1926- 1998. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

Kato, T. (1978). Change and continuity in the Minangkabau matrilineal system. Indonesia, (25), 1-16.

Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An Introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kymlicka, W., & He, B. (Eds.). (2005). Multiculturalism in Asia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Mansoer, M. D., Imran, A., Safwan, M., & Buchari, S. I. (1970). Sedjarah Minangkabau. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bhratara.

Miko, A., & Indradin. (2009). Survei Kembali ke Nagari. ScDEV Universitas Andalas, Padang.

Na’im, A., & Syaputra, H. (2011). Kewarganegaraan, suku bangsa, agama, dan bahasa sehari-hari penduduk Indonesia: Hasil sensus penduduk 2010. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Naim, M. (1990). Nagari versus desa: Sebuah kerancuan struktural. In M. Hasbi, M. Naim, & D. D. B. Sampono (Eds.), Nagari, Desa dan Pembangunan Pedesaan di Sumatera Barat (pp. 47-60). Padang, Indonesia: Yayasan Genta Budaya.

Navis, A. A. (1983). Alur kebudayaan dalam tingkah laku gerakan politik di minangkabau. In A. A. Navis (Ed.), Dialektika di miangkabau dalam kemelut sosial dan politik (p. 80). Padang, Indonesia: Genta Singgalang Press.

Neal, P., & Paris, D. (1990). Liberalism and the communitarian critique: A guide for the perplexed. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 419-439. doi:10.1017/S0008423900012695

Parkinson, J. (2007). Localism and deliberative democracy. The Good Society, 16(1), 23-29. doi:10.1353/gso.0.0001

Pius Kulipossa, F. (2004). Decentralisation and democracy in developing countries: An overview. Development in practice, 14(6), 768-779.

Riley, A. R. (2007). (Tribal) sovereignty and illiberalism. California Law Review, 95(3), 799-848.

Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2004). Modern sociological theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Sairin, S. (1995). Demokrasi dalam Perspektif Kebudayaan Minangkabau. Humaniora, (1), 87-93. doi:10.22146/jh.v0i1.1993

Santoso, P. (2018). Localities as contexts for democracy. In L. N. Bayo, P. Santoso, & W. P. Samadhi (Eds.), Search of local regime in Indonesia: Enhancing democratisation in Indonesia (pp. 35-64). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Pustaka Obor With PolGov fisisp UGM and University of Oslo.

Schiller, T. (2011). Local direct democracy in Europe. Heidelberg, German: VS Verlag.

Sisk, T. D. (2002). Demokrasi di Tingkat lokal: Buku Panduan Internasional IDEA Mengenai Keterlibatan, Keterwakilan, Pengelolaan Konflik dan Kepemerintahan. Edisi Baha. Jakarta: International IDEA.

Stark, A. (2013). The matrilineal system of the Minangkabau and its persistence throughout history: A structural perspective. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(1), 1-13.

Tanjung, I. (2013). Kearifan lokal dan pemberantasan korupsi dalam birokrasi. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 29(1), 101-110. doi:10.29313/mimbar.v29i1.375

Törnquist, O. (2005). The political deficit of substantial democratisation. In J. Harriss, K. Stokke, & O. Törnquist (Eds.), Politicising Democracy. International Political Economy Series (pp. 201-225). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Törnquist, O., Hanif, H., Hiariej, E., Samadhi, W. P., & Savirani, A. (2019). The downside of Indonesia's successful liberal democratisation and the way ahead. Notes from the participatory surveys and case studies 2000–2016. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(1), 123-138. doi:10.1177/186810341703600105

Vel, J. A., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: The return to the nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493-507. doi:10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379

von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2012). Identity in dispute: Law, religion, and identity in Minangkabau. Asian Ethnicity, 13(4), 341-358. doi:10.1080/14631369.2012.710073

von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2013). Political and legal transformations of an Indonesian polity: The Nagari from colonisation to decentralisation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Walzer, M. (1990). The communitarian critique of liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1), 6-23. doi:10.1177/0090591790018001002

Wheatley, S. (2003). Deliberative democracy and minorities. European Journal of International Law, 14(3), 507-527. doi:10.1093/ejil/14.3.507

Xia, N., Lee, Y. F., & Hj. Ab. Halim, A. (2019). The elites’ collective subjectivities of the history of ethnic politics in Malaysia. Asian Ethnicity, 20(2), 168-182.

Published

2024-11-14

Issue

Section

Article