Analysing Local Environmental Disputes and Governance in Belt and Road Host Countries: Establishing Legitimacy through the Social License to Operate (SLO)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/22.4.17-53(2024)Keywords:
local environmental disputes, environmental governance, social license to operate, Belt and Road initiative, soft lawAbstract
While the "Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)" infrastructure projects bring socio-economic benefits to host countries, they also come with the risk of triggering environmental issues within local environmental disputes and governance challenges. Utilizing a combination of theoretical analysis and case studies, this paper investigates the role of the Social License to Operate (SLO) framework in addressing environmental conflicts within Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) infrastructure projects, and how the BRI environmental legal system can be utilised to help BRI projects gain SLOs from local residents in terms of environmental aspects. The findings propose an integrated governance model combining hard and soft law approaches, with specific recommendations for achieving this through improved host country environmental regulation, international investment agreements and oversight responsibilities for Chinese overseas investors, including enhanced public participation and improved environmental impact assessments.
References
Allott, P. (1988). State responsibility and the unmaking of international law. Harvard International Law Journal, 29(1). Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/hilj29&div=6&id=&page =
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
Ascensão, F., Fahrig, L., Clevenger, A. P., Corlett, R. T., Jaeger, J. A., Laurance, W. F., & Pereira, H. M. (2018). Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nature Sustainability, 1(5), 206-209.
Aung, T. S. (2017). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system and implementation in Myanmar: Its significance in oil and gas industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66, 24-32.
Aung, T. S., Fischer, T. B., & Luan, S. (2020). Evaluating environmental impact assessment (EIA) in the countries along the BRIs: System effectiveness and the compatibility with the Chinese EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106361.
Baird, I. G. (2016). Non-government organizations, villagers, political culture and the Lower Sesan 2 dam in northeastern Cambodia. Critical Asian Studies, 48(2), 257-277.
Bell, D., Gray, T., Haggett, C., & Swaffield, J. (2013). Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: Public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 115-135.
Bice, S., & Moffat, K. (2014). Social licence to operate and impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 257-262. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.950122
Bogojević, S., & Zou, M. (2021). Making infrastructure ‘Visible’ in environmental law: The BRI and climate change friction. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(1), 35-56.
Borsellino, L., & Pereira, P. D. (2020). “Libre de los Andes hasta el mar”. Disputas en torno a grandes represas hidroeléctricas de inversiones chinas: El caso del Río Santa Cruz (Provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina). Quid 16: Revista del Área de Estudios Urbanos, (14), 165-186.
Botetzagias, I., & Karamichas, J. (2009). Grassroots mobilisations against waste disposal sites in Greece. Environmental Politics, 18(6), 939-959.
Boulle, M. (2019). The hazy rise of coal in Kenya: The actors, interests, and discursive contradictions shaping Kenya’s electricity future. Energy Research & Social Science, 56, 101205.
Boutilier, R. G. (2014). Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 263-272.
Brookes, N. J., & Locatelli, G. (2015). Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management. Utilities Policy, 36, 57-66.
Brueckner, M., & Eabrasu, M. (2018). Pinning down the social license to operate (SLO): The problem of normative complexity. Resources Policy, 59, 217-226.
Buhmann, K. (2014). Normative discourses and public-private regulatory strategies for construction of CSR normativity: Towards a method for above-national public-private regulation of business social responsibilities-annex A and B. Copenhagen, Denmark: Multivers.
Buhmann, K. (2016). Public regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in recent United Nations instruments on business and human rights and the juridification of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 699-714. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2869-9
Burningham, K. (2000). Using the language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers. Local Environment, 5(1), 55-67.
Burningham, K., Barnett, J., & Thrush, D. (2006). The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: A literature (Working Paper 1.3). Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
China Daily. (2019). The BRI progress, contributions and prospects. Retrieved from https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201904/23/WS5cbe5761a3104842260b7a41_5.html
China Entrepreneurs Forum. (2020). “Yidai yilu” yanxian guojia de huanjing zhuangkuang yu zhuyao wenti [The environmental situation and main problems of the countries along the "the Belt and Road"]. Retrieved from https://www.cefco.cn/content/details945_30392.html
China International Contractors Association. (2019). The BRI infrastructure development index report 2019. Retrieved from https://www.chinca.org/upload/file/20190529/bridi2019en.pdf
Cooney, J. (2017). Reflections on the 20th anniversary of the term ‘social licence’. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 35(2), 197-200.
Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288-300.
Devine‐Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, 8(2), 125-139.
Devine‐Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, 8(2), 125-139.
Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study. Energy Policy, 39(1), 83-93.
Eabrasu, M., Brueckner, M., & Spencer, R. (2021). A social licence to operate legitimacy test: Enhancing sustainability through contact quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126080.
Ek, K. (2005). Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: The case of Swedish wind power. Energy Policy, 33(13), 1677-1689.
Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517-551.
Esteves, A. M., & Vanclay, F. (2009). Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(2), 137-145.
Gathii, J., & Odumosu-Ayanu, I. T. (2016). The turn to contractual responsibility in the global extractive industry. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(1), 69-94. doi:10.1017/bhj.2015.6
Gray, K. R. (2002). Foreign direct investment and environmental impacts—Is the debate over?. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 11(3), 306- 313. doi:10.1111/1467-9388.00329
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307-341. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092687
Hall, N. L., & Jeanneret, T. (2015). Social licence to operate: An opportunity to enhance CSR for deeper communication and engagement. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 213-227.
Han, X. (2018). Environmental protection related to Chinese overseas investments: An investigation from the dimension of investment law. Journal of Xiamen University (A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences), 68(3), 148-159.
Hayes, D. J. (2014). Addressing the environmental impacts of large infrastructure projects: Making mitigation matter. Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis, 44, 10016.
He, J., & Tian, Z. (2019). The evolution of political risk in Chinese overseas investment projects: A case study based on the perspective of legitimacy. Management Review, 31(6), 277-288.
Huang, Z. (2013). Zhongguo guoyou touzī zhe jingwai touzi falü wenti yanjiu [Research on legal issues of Chinese state-owned investors' overseas investment] (Doctoral dissertation, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=RE1hRqpi5T3sucrXWkrAwdkkcQ0XH8u0 AQezLGZNwDrA7zfOR6Y4Qe7rywUTQJ5zS1UHwV0xaxy8uDmfGsvwOiVdz7FEtIU YlV3ZN5y6DlhjWYta- b4bFvVrFjYwLl9K9F4dw_0RjMYxhCteGzPRcoya7cKYe4mgIPOYCcEn0VTaPtl0papL 5ra428bM-OW_&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
Hurst, B., Johnston, K. A., & Lane, A. B. (2022). Achieving, maintaining, and repairing social licence to operate. Governance Directions, 74(1), 490-493.
Inhaber, H. (2018). Slaying the NIMBY dragon. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Jetter, B. (2015). Community participation in Chinese dam projects: What level of community participation is found in large Chinese overseas dam projects and how can this be explained?: A case study of Bui Dam, Ghana (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands). Retrieved from https://essay.utwente.nl/67850/1/Jetter_BA_MB.pdf
Jia, H. (2021). Guoji touzi huanjing baohu zhi guojia zeren: Yi zhongguo haiwai touzi wei shijiao [Study on state responsibilities regarding environment protection in international investments: From the perspective of Chinese overseas investments]. Beijing, China: Law Press.
Jijelava, D., & Vanclay, F. (2017). Legitimacy, credibility and trust as the key components of a social licence to operate: An analysis of BP's projects in Georgia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1077-1086. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.070
Jijelava, D., & Vanclay, F. (2018). How a large project was halted by the lack of a social Licence to operate: Testing the applicability of the Thomson and Boutilier model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 73, 31-40.
Joyce, S., & Thomson, I. (2000). Earning a social licence to operate: Social acceptability and resource development in Latin America. CIM Bulletin, 93(1037), 49-53.
Koivurova, T., Buanes, A., Riabova, L., Didyk, V., Ejdemo, T., Poelzer, G., . . . Lesser, P. (2015). ‘Social license to operate’: A relevant term in Northern European mining?. Polar Geography, 38(3), 194-227.
Lake, R. W. (1993). Planners' alchemy transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBY. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(1), 87-93.
Langbroek, M., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Learning from the social impacts associated with initiating a windfarm near the former island of Urk, The Netherlands. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(3), 167-178.
Li, D., Chen, X., & Wohlfarth, P. (2022). Public participation, investment networks, and China's outward FDI: Evidence from 58 countries along the BRI. Emerging Markets Review, 51, 100887.
Liu, C., & Tang, J. (2020). A study on the mechanism, governance difficulties and countermeasures of the NIMBY conflicts around the Belt and Road Public infrastructure construction projects. Journal of Xiangtan University: Philosophy And Social Sciences, 44(2), 27-32.
Liu, E. (2015). The structuring of the legal system of environmental protection in the construction of "The Belt and Road" project. Theory and Modernization, (6), 108-112.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Moffat, K., & Louis, W. (2017). Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate. Resources Policy, 54, 137-146.
Mining Act 2012, No. 36 § 128 (South Sudan); 2011 Mining Code, amended by Act L/2011/006/CNT § 130 (Guinea).
Mining Law No. (20) (2014) art. 8(2)(f) (Mozam).
Negatu, G. (2017). Re: Comments on the Environment and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Study for the Proposed 1,050 MW Coal Fired Power Plant Project, Kenya. Retrieved from https://www.accountabilitycounsel.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/11.24.2017- AfDB-submission-on-Lamu-ESIA-FINAL.pdf
Nelsen, J. L. (2006). Social license to operate. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 20(3), 161-162.
Nigerian Minerals and Mining Act (2007) Cap. (M12), § 116 (Nigeria).
Ning, H., & Qi, T. (2016). The "One Belt One Road" initiative and sustainable development: A perspective of international investment law. Wuhan University International Law Review, (1), 228-245.
Nwapi, C. (2016). Can the concept of social licence to operate find its way into the formal legal system. Flinders Law Journal, 18, 349.
O’Garra, T., Mourato, S., & Pearson, P. (2008). Investigating attitudes to hydrogen refuelling facilities and the social cost to local residents. Energy Policy, 36(6), 2074-2085.
Prno, J., & Scott Slocombe, D. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346-357. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
Pu, D. (2020). “Yidai yilu” nengyuan touzi zhong lin bi fengxian kuosan jili yanjiu [Study on the diffusion mechanism of NIMBY risk in "the Belt and Road" energy investment] (Master’s thesis, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China). Retrieved from https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27753/d.cnki.gcqgx.2020.000017
Raitzer, D., Samson, J. N., & Nam, K. Y. (2015). Achieving environmental sustainability in Myanmar (Working Paper no. 467). Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Shan, C., & Yai, T. (2011). Public involvement requirements for infrastructure planning in China. Habitat International, 35(1), 158-166. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.004
Tetrault Sirsly, C. A., & Lvina, E. (2019). From doing good to looking even better: The dynamics of CSR and reputation. Business & Society, 58(6), 1234-1266.
The Mines and Minerals Act, 2009, Sierra Leone Gazette Supplement Vol. CXLI, No. 3 § 139 (Sierra Leone).
The Mining Acts, No. 12 (2016) Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 71 § 109.
Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. SME mining engineering handbook, 1, 1779-1796.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375-400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. (2015). Social impact assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo, ND: International Association for Impact Assessment.
Waldo, Å. (2012). Offshore wind power in Sweden—A qualitative analysis of attitudes with particular focus on opponents. Energy Policy, 41, 692-702.
Wang, Y. [Yang], Han, Q., De Vries, B., & Zuo, J. (2016). How the public reacts to social impacts in construction projects? A structural equation modeling study. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1433-1448.
Wang, Y. [Yuesheng], Bian, E., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Three waves of China’s economic opening-up and its evolution logic: Also on the characteristics and influence of RECP, CECAI and CPTPP. Reform, (5), 76-87.
Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 21(1), 49-64.
Wu, Y. (2023). Zhongguo zai yuenan touzi qiye lin bi fengxian chuanbo huanjing yu goutong xianzhuang diaocha baogao [Survey report on the NIMBY risk aversion communication environment and communication status of Chinese investment enterprises in Vietnam] (Master’s thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=RE1hRqpi5T1mdjhUXk3BShQwyAbuSBQ 8YY-1tQiZxQ7ZwS2pq-cv7PAFQZ83veKr25se9_owo7lGbDo- yLdOSmsa9Eil5r0nduCImb30Y6L7QFnRZkL4A2s1uOtr4vIIrsGlzv_US9Z1g6iAQ5e78 PH5kyUolsjQ0zg4VSg18g6Wm_ojrWqmYb- 4RR7KMeg8r4OjTeIh5WA=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
Zeng, H. (2013). Dangqian guoji touzi zhengce quxiang yu woguo de ying you zuowei [Current Trends in International Investment Policies and China's Due Diligence]. Guangming Daily. Retrieved from https://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2013- 08/07/nw.D110000gmrb_20130807_4-11.htm
Zheng, Q. (2023). Woguo zai miandian touzi qiye lin bi fengxian de shehui fangda yu chuanbo zhili yanjiu [Research on social amplification and communication governance of NIMBY risk in China's investment enterprises in Myanmar] (Master’s thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China). Retrieved from https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27034/d.cnki.ggxiu.2022.000240
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
