Use of Artificial Intelligence and other Digital Tools in Participatory Budget Practice—Empirical Evidence from Slovenia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/23.3.194-209(2025)Abstract
Participatory budgeting (PB) has gained global attention as a democratic innovation, while artificial intelligence (AI) is already reshaping various local government operations. This article employs content analysis and survey research to explore the impact of AI and other digital tools on PB practices in Slovenia, where PB was formally introduced in 2018. The findings reveal a growing acceptance of diverse digital tools in PB processes, while the use of AI remains in its early stages. The study highlights the need for further research into the barriers hindering the use of AI and other digital tools in PB. One potential solution is to tailor and combine PB practices to better align with the specific needs of individual municipalities. In general, the research results presented in the article shed light on the evolving landscape of PB practices in Slovenian municipalities and the role of AI and other digital tools in PB processes.
References
Ahn, B., Friesenecker, M., Kazepov, Y., & Brandl, J. (2023). How context matters: Challenges of localizing participatory budgeting for climate change adaptation in Vienna. Urban Planning, 8(1), 399-413. doi:10.17645/up.v8i1.6067
Aichholzer, G., & Rose, G. (2020). Experience with digital tools in different types of e-participation. In L. Hennen, I. van Keulen, I. Korthagen, G. Aichholzer, R. Lindner, & R. Nielsen (Eds.), European e-democracy in practice (pp. 59-81). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., & Svobodová, L. (2020). How a participatory budget can support sustainable rural development—Lessons from Poland. Sustainability, 12(7), 2620. doi:10.3390/su12072620
Bland, G. (2017). Sustainability as a measure of success: Externally promoted participatory budgeting in El Salvador 10 years later. Public Administration and Development, 37(2), 110-121.
Brezovar, N., & Stanimirović, T. (2022). Sustainability aspects of participatory budgeting at the municipal level in Slovenia. Public Sector Economics, 46(4), 569-589. doi:10.3326/pse.46.4.6
Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Retrieved from https://www.iied.org/g00471
Camello, J., & Sousa, M. J. (2024). Is The Intelligent Participatory Budget (i-PB) the next generation of democracy and governance?. In M. J. Sousa, S. Pani, F. dal Mas, & S. Sousa (Eds.), Incorporating AI technology in the service sector (pp. 153-165). Palm Bay, FL: Apple Academic Press. doi:10.1201/9781003378068
Cantador, I., & Cortés-Cediel, M. E. (2018). Towards increasing citizen engagement in participatory budgeting digital tools. In A. Zuiderwijk & C. C. Hinnant (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (Article No. 91, pp. 1-2). doi:10.1145/3209281.3209389
Cellini, M., & Antonucci, M. C. (2022). For the few and under specific conditions. Participatory budgeting in Milan: evidence from an online survey on PB participants in Italy’s second largest city. Contemporary Italian Politics, 14(3), 352-369. doi:10.1080/23248823.2022.2043426
De Vries, M. S., Nemec, J., & Špaček, D. (2022). International trends in participatory budgeting. Governance and public management. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairstein, R., Benadè, G., & Gal, K. (2023, June). Participatory budgeting designs for the real world. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37(5), 5633-5640. doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25699
Heinisuo, E., Kuoppakangas, P., & Stenvall, J. (2025). Navigating AI Implementation in Local Government: Addressing Dilemmas by Fostering Mutuality and Meaningfulness. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-22. doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10599-x
Klun, M., & Benčina, J. (2021). Predictors, determinant groups, and participatory budgeting. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 21(2), 186-208.
Koliousis, I., Al-Surmi, A., & Bashiri, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and policy making: Can small municipalities enable digital transformation?. International Journal of Production Economics, 274, 109324. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109324
Lund, V., & Juujärvi, S. (2018, September). The role of digital tools in the participatory budgeting process in the development of a neighbourhood. In E. Aarrevaara & A. Harjapää (Eds.), Smart Cities in Smart Regions: Conference Proceedings (pp. 92-103). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10138/310290
Mærøe, A. R., Norta, A., Tsap, V., & Pappel, I. (2021). Increasing citizen participation in e-participatory budgeting processes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 125-147. doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1821421
Mathebula, N. (2015). Community participation in the South African local government dispensation: A public administration scholastic misnomer. Central European Public Administration Review, 13(3-4), 185-199. doi:10.17573/ipar.2015.3-4.08
Mikalef, P., Fjørtoft, S. O., & Torvatn, H. Y. (2019). Artificial intelligence in the public sector: A study of challenges and opportunities for Norwegian municipalities. In I. O. Pappas, P. Mikalef, Y. K. Dwivedi, L. Jaccheri, J. Krogstie, & M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Digital transformation for a sustainable society in the 21st century (pp. 283-294). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ninčević Pašalić, I. (2024). E-participation in local self-government in Croatia. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 24(3), 447-476. doi:10.31297/hkju.24.3.3
Przysucha, L. (2022). Acquiring knowledge using crowdsourcing and AI: Participatory budget and related risks. In E. Aïmeur, N. E. Díaz Ferreyra, & H. Hage (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Adverse Impacts and Collateral Effects of Artificial Intelligence Technologies (pp. 54-60). Retrieved from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3275/paper4.pdf
Radu, B. (2019). The impact of transparency on the citizen participation in decision-making at the municipal level in Romania. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(1), 111-130. doi:10.17573/cepar.2019.1.06
Ransbotham, S., Gerbert, P., Reeves, M., Kiron, D., & Spira, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence in business gets real. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/artificial-intelligence-in-business-gets-real/
Schippers, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and democratic politics. Political Insight, 11(1), 32-35. doi:10.1177/2041905820911746
Sgueo, G. (2016). Participatory budgeting: An innovative approach. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2712213
Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164-178. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
Stortone, S., & De Cindio, F. (2015). Hybrid participatory budgeting: Local democratic practices in the digital era. In M. Foth, M. Brynskov, & T. Ojala (Eds.), Citizen’s right to the digital city (pp. 195-214). Singapore, Republic of Singapore: Springer.
Touchton, M., & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442-1469.
Valle-Cruz, D., Fernandez-Cortez, V., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2022). From e-budgeting to smart budgeting: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in government decision-making for resource allocation. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101644. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101644
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
