The Analysis of the Influence of Government Diversity Policy Intervention, Service Innovation and Competitive Performance on Social Governance from the Perspective of Inclusiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/22.3.248-266(2024)Keywords:
enterprise, inclusion, diversity, service innovation, competitive performanceAbstract
In order to enhance the effectiveness of social governance and accelerate economic development, this paper explores the role of diversified and inclusive policies introduced by local governments in service innovation and competitive performance, as well as their impact on improving local governance. From the perspective of social governance, several hypotheses are proposed, including: what role inclusive policies play in service innovation and competitive performance; Has diversification policy improved service innovation and competitive performance; Can the government's diversified and inclusive policies improve the social governance environment and enhance binding laws and regulations; Can service innovation and competitive performance provide conditions for social governance. The analysis results indicate that diversified and inclusive policies can effectively improve service innovation and competitive performance, and directly affect social governance. Inclusive and diverse policies can significantly improve service innovation and competitive performance, and drive them towards a positive direction. Service innovation and competitive performance are good conditions for social governance, providing support for the improvement of relevant laws and regulations. Therefore, the government should introduce diversified and inclusive policies to promote the development of service innovation and competitive performance, create a good external environment for social governance, and promote the improvement of relevant laws and regulations.
References
Al-Jaradi, M. H., de Waal, A., & Al-Hadramy, A. M. (2023). Increasing competitive performance through effective use of performance management systems. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(7), 1924-1941.
Amore, M. D., & Garofalo, O. (2016). Executive gender, competitive pressures, and corporate performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 308-327.
Colle, L., Dimaggio, G., Carcione, A., Nicolò, G., Semerari, A., & Chiavarino, C. (2020). Do competitive contexts affect mindreading performance?. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1284.
Feichter, C., Moers, F., & Timmermans, O. (2022). Relative performance evaluation and competitive aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(5), 1859-1913.
Hossain, S. T., Yigitcanlar, T., Nguyen, K., & Xu, Y. (2024). Understanding local government cybersecurity policy: A concept map and framework. Information, 15(6). doi:10.3390/info15060342.
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049-1074.
Gross, D. P. (2017). Performance feedback in competitive product development. The RAND Journal of Economics, 48(2), 438-466.
Halperin, I., Chapman, D. W., Martin, D. T., Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2017). Choices enhance punching performance of competitive kickboxers. Psychological Research, 81, 1051-1058.
Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Galanis, E., Zourbanos, N., & Theodorakis, Y. (2014). Self-talk and competitive sport performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 26(1), 82-95.
Ibarra-Cisneros, M. A., Hernández-Perlines, F., & Rodríguez-García, M. (2020). Intellectual capital, organisational performance and competitive advantage. European Journal of International Management, 14(6), 976-998.
Kaleka, A., & Morgan, N. A. (2017). Which competitive advantage (s)? Competitive advantage–market performance relationships in international markets. Journal of International Marketing, 25(4), 25-49.
Luoma, J., Ruutu, S., King, A. W., & Tikkanen, H. (2017). Time delays, competitive interdependence, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 506-525.
Melin, M., Hill, R. A., Bellamy, P. E., & Hinsley, S. A. (2019). On bird species diversity and remote sensing—utilizing lidar and hyperspectral data to assess the role of vegetation structure and foliage characteristics as drivers of avian diversity. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(7), 2270-2278.
Meyskens, M., & Carsrud, A. L. (2013). Nascent green-technology ventures: A study assessing the role of partnership diversity in firm success. Small Business Economics, 40, 739-759.
Newbery, D. (2009). Competitive electricity markets: design, implementation, performance. Energy Journal, 30(1), 82-184.
Rangel, W., Ugrinowitsch, C., & Lamas, L. (2019). Basketball players' versatility: Assessing the diversity of tactical roles. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14(4), 552-561.
Saville, B. K. (2009). Performance under competitive and self-competitive fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 59(1), 21-38.
Snyder, K. (2003) Mashindano! Competitive music performance in East Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(4), 822-823.
Stambaugh, J., Lumpkin, G. T., Mitchell, R. K., Brigham, K., & Cogliser, C. (2020). Competitive aggressiveness, community banking and performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(2), 221-240.
Tsiakara, A. A., & Digelidis, N. M. (2015). Preschoolers' perceptions of performance and satisfaction under competitive and non-competitive conditions. Early Child Development and Care, 185(7), 1109-1117.
Yap, C. S. & Rashid, M. Z. A. (2011) Competitive intelligence practices and firm performance. Libri, 61(3), 175-189.
Zhou, W., Huang, W., & Zhou, S. X. (2017). Energy performance contracting in a competitive environment. Decision Sciences, 48(4), 723-765.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
