Exploring Ripeness and Readiness Models in the Context of Indo-Pak Conflict: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/23.3.172-193(2025)Keywords:
conflict resolution, peacebuilding, ripeness and readiness model, Indo-Pak conflictAbstract
This paper critically assesses the application of ripeness and readiness models to the Indo-Pak conflict and offers a concise analysis of the current state of this field. The main purpose of the research paper is to discuss conflict resolution between India and Pakistan in the context of Ripeness and Readiness Models. The Indo-Pak conflict originated from 1947 Partition of British India and the historical difficulties in managing tensions, be it border disputes, warfare, or terrorism by non-state actors, have hindered effective conflict resolution between the two countries. This paper explores a novel and unique area which has never been discussed before in the way it has. From the thorough literature review it has been found that only a limited number of articles have explored the impact of peacebuilding and legitimacy on the Indo-Pak conflict. Notably, the terms "ripeness model," "readiness model," and "Indo-Pak conflict" emerged as the most frequently occurring keywords in the literature, but the synthesis of these data variables remains a less explored aspect. Ten research articles focusing on the application of ripeness and readiness models to the Indo-Pak conflict, published between 1974 and 2019 were selected from five databases following a predetermined review protocol. This research paper provides a valuable contribution to the national and international literature on the peace and conflict studies, refinement of conflict resolution strategies in the region and offers valuable insights aimed at resolving the long-standing Indo-Pak conflict through applicability of ripeness and readiness models.
References
Aijazi, O. (2019, August). How to be an ally with Kashmir: War stories from the kitchen. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-to-be-an-ally-with-kashmir-war-stories-from-the-kitchen-121801
Akhtar, D., Hussain, F., Nawaz, S., & Haider, S. (2021). An analysis of Pak-India rivalry over Kashmir dispute: A conflict resolution approach. Elementary Education Online, 20(3), 1979-1986.
Aslam, M. W., & Saeed, M. M. (2021). The role of Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the resolution of Indo-Pak conflicts: Future prospects and recommendations. Journal of Indian Studies, 7(02), 399-410.
Biberman-Ocakli, Y. (2021). Prospects for a Kashmir peace deal: Ripeness, readiness, and the US role. Retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/5v47td
Campbell, J. (1976). Successful negotiation: Trieste. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cantekin, A. (2016). Ripeness and readiness theories in international conflict resolution. Journal of Mediation & Applied Conflict Analysis, 3(2), 414-428.
Cheema, P. I. (2019). Pakistan, India, and Kashmir: A historical review. In R. G. Thomas (Ed.), Perspectives on Kashmir (pp. 93-118). New York, NY: Routledge.
Coleman, P. T., Hacking, A. G., Stover, M. A., Fisher‐Yoshida, B., & Nowak, A. (2008). Reconstructing ripeness I: A study of constructive engagement in protracted social conflicts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 3-42.
Das, T. K. (2019). India and Pakistan conflict: A way towards resolution. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3508975
Davis, Z. (Ed.). (2011). The India-Pakistan Military Standoff: Crisis and escalation in South Asia. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Evans, M. J., & Tyler‐Evans, M. (2002). Aspects of grief in conflict: Re‐visioning response to dispute. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20(1), 83-97.
Frantz, C. M., & Bennigson, C. (2005). Better late than early: The influence of timing on apology effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 201-207.
Hancock, L. E., & Mitchell, C. (2018). Local peacebuilding and legitimacy. Interactions between National and Local Levels, Milton: Taylor and Francis, 1-19.
Jha, L. K. (2019, December). US, India announce establishment of annual parliamentary exchange. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/usindia-announce-establishment-of-annual-parliamentaryexchange/articleshow/72896871.cms?from=mdr
Kissinger, H. A. (1974). Address to the sixth special session of the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization, 28(3), 573-583.
Lieberfeld, D. (1999). Conflict “Ripeness” revisited: The South African and Israeli/Palestinian Cases. Negotiation Journal, 15(1), 63-82.
Lim, W. M., Rasul, T., Kumar, S., & Ala, M. (2022). Past, present, and future of customer engagement. Journal of Business Research, 140, 439-458.
Mitchell, C. (1995). The right moment: Notes on four models of “ripeness”. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations, 9(2), 38-52.
Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 1-5.
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: what do we know and what do we need to know?. International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1-O16.
Pruitt. (1997). Ripeness theory and the Oslo talks. International Negotiation, 2(2), 237-250.
Schwartz, A., & Gilboa, E. (2021). False readiness: Expanding the concept of readiness in conflict resolution theory. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1328-1348.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Spector, B. I. (2002). Negotiation readiness in the development context: Adding capacity to ripeness. In H. W. Jeong (Ed. ), Approaches to peacebuilding (pp. 80-100). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stedman, S. J. (1991). Conflict and conflict resolution in Africa: A conceptual framework. In F. M. Deng & I. W. Zartman (Eds.), Conflict resolution in Africa (pp. 367-399). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Stimec, A., Guillotreau, P., & Poitras, J. (2011). Ripeness and grief in conflict analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20(4), 489-507.
Zartman, I. W. (2001). The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), 8-18.
Zartman, I. W., & Rubin, J. Z. (Eds.). (2000). Power and negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Zizic, M. C., Mladineo, M., Gjeldum, N., & Celent, L. (2022). From industry 4.0 towards industry 5.0: A review and analysis of paradigm shift for the people, organization and technology. Energies, 15(14), 5221.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
