Deliberative Democracy Innovations at Citizen Level: Challenges of Local Government in Indonesia

Authors

  • Novita Tresiana Universitas Lampung, Department of Public Administration
  • Noverman Duadji Universitas Lampung, Department of Public Administration
  • Pairulsyah . Universitas Lampung, Department of Sociology
  • Suwarno . Universitas Lampung, Department of Sociology
  • Anita Damayantie Universitas Lampung, Department of Sociology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4335/21.4.807-832(2023)

Keywords:

deliberative democracy, village planning, innovation environment, local government

Abstract

This paper examined the roadmap for deliberative democracy development through village-level regional development planning forums in Indonesia and connected it with the strength of traditions and local values of a region. Roadmap innovations can solve problems and increase governance capacity. This study aimed to identify innovation challenges & factors affecting the innovation environment; using a qualitative method with a case study design. As a result, innovation is able to increase interaction and agreement on solving public policy problems and improve local government governance capacity. The challenge was determined by the open leadership, responsive village leadership behavior. Forums transform as a formal dialogue space and media for the contestation of knowledge with informal meetings in the community. The community traditions are present, recognized, valued through institutionalizing local institutions, local actors, and features that drive democracy in community consultation and cooperation. Several factors affecting the innovation environment included legal culture and policy, political& administrative environment, government & civil servant traditions. The government needs to carry out institutional conversions along with changes from the government, deliberation spaces, &communities to achieve these two goals.

References

Adenskog, M. (2018) After the equilibrium: Democratic innovations and long-term institutional development in the City of Reykjavik, Analyse Und Kritik, 40(1), pp. 31–53.

Airaksinen, J. & Albrecht, E. (2019) Arguments and their effects – A case study on drafting the legislation on the environmental impacts of peat extraction in Finland, Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, pp. 1004–1012.

Andanda, P. (2019) Public engagement as a potential responsible research and innovation tool for ensuring inclusive governance of biotechnology innovation in low- and middle-income countries, In: von Schomberg, R. (ed.) International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource (America: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd), pp. 113-202.

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A. & Dharmawan, L. (2016) Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), pp. 161–183.

Arvind, G. R. (2012) Deliberative democracy, people's agency, and education: A case of dialogic transformation of a school system, In: Mitchell, R. C. & Moore, S. A. (eds.) Politics, Participation & Power Relations: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Critical Citizenship in the Classroom and Community (Netherlands: Sense Publishers), pp. 1-17.

Baogang, H. (2012) Four models of the relationship between confucianism and democracy, In: Dallmayr, F. & Tingyang, Z. (eds.) Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives (Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky), pp. 131-151, available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905310638 &partnerID=40 & md5=bc08c7556642b1d4e84861a5ae5ba849 (March 1, 2023).

Bebbington, A., Dharmawan, L., Fahmi, E. & Guggenheim, S. (2006) Local Capacity, Village Governance, and the Political Economy of Rural Development in Indonesia, World Development, 34(11), pp. 1958–1976.

Benham, C. F. & Hussey, K. E. (2018) Mainstreaming deliberative principles in Environmental Impact Assessment: current practice and future prospects in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Environmental Science and Policy, 89, pp. 176–183.

Berenschot, W. (2018) Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia, Public Administration, and Development, 38(4), pp. 135–143.

Bijulal, M. V. (2018) Rights of the urban poor in Delhi and deliberative democracy: Understanding the aam aadmi party experience, In: Joseph, T. & Joseph, S. K. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Understanding the Indian Experience (London: Taylor and Francis), pp. 16-28.

Bocatto, E. & Perez-De-Toledo, E. (2020) Knowledge acquisition and meaning-making in the participatory budgeting of local governments, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2), pp. 149–160.

Borov, A. H., Dzamihov, K. F. & Karamurzov, B. S. (2017) Sustainable development and politics: Fundamental issues in a regional perspective, Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories, 9(4), pp. 325–331.

Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L. & Jacobs, L. R. (2004) Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature, Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), pp. 315–344.

Castells, M. (2015) Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age (New Jersey: Polity), available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/ Networks+ of+ Outrage+ and+ Hope%3A+ Social+ Movements+in+the+Internet+Age%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780745695761 (March 1, 2023).

Chaskin, R., Khare, A. & Joseph, M. (2012) Participation, Deliberation, and Decision Making: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion in Mixed-Income Developments, Urban Affairs Review, 48(6), pp. 863–906.

Clutton, C. (2018) Cultural competence for health policy development, International Journal of Community Diversity, 17(4), pp. 15-26.

Creswell, J. W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.) (Singapura: SAGE Publications), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.

Croissant, A. & Lorenz, P. (2018) Comparative politics of Southeast Asia: an introduction to governments and political regimes (Berlin: Spinger link).

Djafar, T. B. M., Zamharir, H. & Syam, F. (2019) Participation deficit in local governance in contemporary Indonesia, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 9(1), pp. 303-320, available at: https://www. scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85080110751& partnerID=40&md5=f071bf9afe84478c7feee97a629cbe85 (March 2, 2023).

Drew, J. (2019) Can a local government by lottery increase democratic responsiveness?, Policy and Politics, 47(4), pp. 621–636.

Duadji, N. & Tresiana, N. (2016) Pemodelan dalam Forum Musrenbang Desa di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan dan Kabupaten Pesawaran Modelling Forum Musrenbang Desa in Lampung Selatan and Pesawaran Regency, POLITIK: Jurnal Kajian Politik Dan Masalah Pembangunan, 12(2), pp. 1829–1844.

Duadji, N. & Tresiana, N. (2018) A participation model based on community forum as a reproductive health knowledge transaction space to increase male participation in vasectomy, Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 31(1), p. 1.

Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2020) The online discourse as a form of e-Participation: The experience of internet discourse research, In: Charalabidis, Y. & Cunha, M. A. (eds.) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (Canada: Association for Computing Machinery), pp. 326–333.

Fischer, F. (2010) Policy deliberation: Confronting subjectivity and emotional expression, Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), pp. 407–420.

Fischer, F. & Gottweis, H. (2013) The argumentative turn in public policy revisited: Twenty years later, Critical Policy Studies, 7(4), pp. 425–433.

Fritzen, S. A. (2007) Can the Design of Community-Driven Development Reduce the Risk of Elite Capture? Evidence from Indonesia, World Development, 35(8), pp. 1359–1375.

García Agustín, Ó. (2012) Transnational deliberative democracy in the context of the European Union: The institutionalization of the European integration forum, EIOP European Integration Online Papers, 16.

Gulakov, I. & Vanclay, F. (2019) Social impact assessment and stakeholder engagement in the Russian Federation: Representativeness, deliberativeness, and influence, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 75, pp. 37–46.

Hahn, A. (2018) Mongolia’s 2015 Referendum via Text Messaging: Engaging Rural and Nomadic Citizens in Public Screen Deliberation, International Journal of Communication, 12, pp. 4379–4400.

He, B. & Wagenaar, H. (2018) Authoritarian deliberation revisited, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 19(4), pp. 622–629.

Holst, C. & Moe, H. (2021) Deliberative Systems Theory and Citizens' Use of Online Media: Testing a Critical Theory of Democracy on a High Achiever, Political Studies, 69(1), pp. 129–146.

Hurst, S. A., Schindler, M., Goold, S. D. & Danis, M. (2018) Swiss-CHAT: Citizens discuss priorities for Swiss health insurance coverage, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(8), pp. 746–754.

Ionescu, D. P. & Eliantonio, M. (2021) Democratic Legitimacy and Soft Law in the EU Legal Order: A Theoretical Perspective, Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17(1), pp. 43–65.

Jupesta, J., Supriyanto, A. A., Martin, G., Piliang, J., Yang, S., Purnomo, A., Neville, A. & Caliman, J.-P. (2020) Establishing multi-partnerships environmental governance in Indonesia: Case of desa makmur peduli api (prosperous and fire-free village) program, In: Squires, V. R. & Gaur, M. K. (eds.) Food Security and Land Use Change under Conditions of Climatic Variability: A Multidimensional Perspective (New York: Springer International Publishing), pp. 21-34.

Karim, M. R. & Thiel, A. (2017) Role of a community-based local institution for climate change adaptation in the Teesta riverine area of Bangladesh, Climate Risk Management, 17, pp. 92–103.

Kendi, I. K. (2017) Analysis of governance policy in cultural villages of sentani, Papua, Indonesia, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(9), pp. 852–866.

Kepramareni, P., Yuliastuti, I. A. N. & Mariantini, N. L. M. (2020) Village accountability of village fund management in Gianyar Bali Indonesia, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(1 Special Issue), pp. 849–855.

Klintman, M. (2009) Participation in green consumer policies: Deliberative democracy under wrong conditions?, Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(1), pp. 43–57.

Kondrashov, P. N. (2018) What ideology is necessary for Russia, and whether it is necessary? (About the book »Russia in search of ideologies: The transformation of value regulators of modern societies«), Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2018-Janua(10), pp. 162–167.

Kusumastuti (2017) The old phrase of Javanese villages as an early form of participatory democratic governance in Indonesia, Journal of Regional and City Planning, 28(3), pp. 219–236.

Kusumastuti, H., Supriyono, B., Mindarti, L. I. & Wanto, A. H. (2020) The capacity and innovation of services in organizing village governance in Indonesia [La capacidad e innovación de los servicios en la organización de la gobernanza de las aldeas en Indonesia], Opcion, 36(Special Edition 26), pp. 1681–1696.

Lalor, B. M. & Hickey, G. M. (2013) Environmental science and public policy in Executive government: Insights from Australia and Canada, Science and Public Policy, 40(6), pp. 767–778.

Lee, Y. H. & Jin, D. Y. (2014) Technology and citizens: An analysis of citizens' jury on the Korean National Pandemic response system, Javnost, 21(3), pp. 23–38.

Lehtonen, M. (2006) Deliberative Democracy, Participation, and OECD Peer Reviews of Environmental Policies, American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), pp. 185–200.

Lenzi, D. (2019) Deliberating about Climate Change: The Case for "Thinking and Nudging", Moral Philosophy and Politics, 6(2), pp. 313–336.

Lewanski, R. (2020) Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy: the 'Tuscany laboratory', Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 9(1).

Lutpiah, M., Suryadi, S. & Faizi, F. (2017) Pemekaran desa dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kehidupan Masyarakat, Empower: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam.

Ma, Z. (2017) An online forum of the third type: The case of Suzhou's Hanshan Wenzhong Forum, Communication and the Public, 2(1), pp. 67–83.

Madyan, M., Prihantono, G. & Aisyah, R. A. (2020) Governance in a village fund program in East Java Indonesia, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(11), pp. 344–365.

Mannarini, T. & Fedi, A. (2018) Using Quali-Quantitative Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Citizen Participation: A Study on Three Citizen Juries, Social Indicators Research, 139(2), pp. 473–490.

Mckeown, M., Jones, F., Wright, K., Spandler, H., Wright, J., Fletcher, H., Duxbury, J., Mcvittie, J., Simon & Turton, W. (2016) It's the talk: A study of involvement initiatives in secure mental health settings, Health Expectations, 19(3), pp. 570–579.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (New York: SAGE).

Montpetit, É., Scala, F. & Fortier, I. (2004) The paradox of deliberative democracy: The National Action Committee on the Status of Women and Canada's policy on reproductive technology, Policy Sciences, 37(2), pp. 137–157.

Nas, J., Nurlinah & Haryanto (2019) Indigenous village governance: Lessons from Indonesia, Public Administration Issues, 2019(6), pp. 94–104.

Nurjaman, N. (2015) Dinamika dan Problematika Implementasi Undang-Undang Desa: Pembelajaran dari Tiga Daerah di Jawa Barat, Jurnal Desentralisasi, 13, pp. 47–60.

Nurlinah & Haryanto (2020) Institutional mechanisms and civic forum in coastal village governance in Indonesia [Instituciniai svertai ir piliečių forumas Indonezijos pakrančių gyvenvietėse], Public Policy and Administration, 19(3), pp. 76–85.

Nurlinah, Haryanto & Sunardi (2020) New development, olancientigration, and governance at two villages in Jeneponto, Indonesia, World Development Perspectives, 19.

O'Malley, E., Farrell, D. M. & Suiter, J. (2020) Does talking matter? A quasi-experiment assessing the impact of deliberation and information on opinion change, International Political Science Review, 41(3), pp. 321–334.

Pattiasina, V., Seralurin, Y. C., Kadubu, H. U., Hamadi, M. & Bonsafia, M. (2020) Implementation of village financial system applications in managing village fund: A study in Papua-Indonesia, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4 Special Issue), pp. 477–489.

Qin, X. & He, B. (2021) The politics of authoritarian empowerment: Participatory pricing in China, International Political Science Review, 43(5), https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120985511.

Rachma, D. D., Somaji, R. P. & Kustono, A. S. (2019) Government expenditure, poverty and income inequality in Indonesia: New evidence from village funds, International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(8), pp. 38–42.

Ramsey, P. (2013) The search for a civic commons online: An assessment of existing BBC Online policy, Media, Culture and Society, 35(7), pp. 864–879.

Ravazzi, S. (2017) When a government attempts to institutionalize and regulate deliberative democracy: the how and why from a process-tracing perspective, Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), pp. 79–100.

Reedy, J., Orr, R., Spicer, P., Blanchard, J. W., Hiratsuka, V. Y., Ketchum, T. S., Saunkeah, B., Wark, K. & Woodbury, R. B. (2020) Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1).

Renwick, A., Allan, S., Jennings, W., Mckee, R., Russell, M. & Smith, G. (2018) What Kind of Brexit do Voters want? Lessons from the Citizens' Assembly on Brexit, Political Quarterly, 89(4), pp. 649–658.

Retno, S. A. & Asra’I, M. (2018) Public Consultation: Collaboration of Government and Citizens in the Local Requirements-Based Policy Processing, In: Warsito, M. & Hadiyanto, B. (eds.) E3S Web of Conferences, 73 (France: EDP Sciences), pp. 1-4.

Ritter, A., Lancaster, K. & Diprose, R. (2018) Improving drug policy: The potential of broader democratic participation, International Journal of Drug Policy, 55, pp. 1–7.

Schafer, J. G. (2016) Making role-playing real, Teaching Public Administration, 34(2), pp. 150–158.

Shortall, R. (2021) Deliberative appraisal methods, Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, 7, pp. 51–82.

Siddiqui, T., Szaboova, L., Adger, W. N., de Campos, R., Bhuiyan, M. R. A. & Billah, T. (2021) Policy Opportunities and Constraints for Addressing Urban Precarity of Migrant Populations, Global Policy, 12(S2), pp. 91–105.

Simon-Kumar, R. (2018) Inclusionary policy and marginalized groups in Aotearoa/New Zealand process, impacts, and politics, Kotuitui, 13(2), pp. 246–260.

Sukmawati, F. (2019) The effect ability of village fund management apparatus, village government organizational commitments, and community participation on accountability for the management of village funds in sub-districts in Indonesia, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(7 Special Issue), pp. 653–659.

Susilo, D., Hidayat, E. & Marta, R. F. (2021) Village public innovations during COVID19 pandemic in rural areas: Phenomena in Madura, Indonesia, Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1).

Sutiyo, Maharjan, K. L., Sutiyo & Maharjan, K. L. (2017) Historical Background of Decentralization in Indonesia, In: Sutiyo & Maharjan, K. L.) (eds.) Decentralization and Rural Development in Indonesia (Singapore: Springer Singapore), pp. 1–11.

Toussaint, B. (2019) Transport history as policy lab for democratic governance, Journal of Transport History, 40(2), pp. 270–280.

Tresiana, N. & Duadji, N. (2016a) Multi Stakeholders Governance Body Model In Achieving the Excellence Public Policy, MIMBAR, Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 32(2), p. 401.

Tresiana, N. & Duadji, N. (2016b) Kegagalan pemaknaan “Lembaga Musawarah Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Desa”dalam mewujudkan deepening democracy, Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 29(4), p. 191.

Vel, J. A. C. & Bedner, A. W. (2015) Decentralization and village governance in Indonesia: The return to the Nagari and the 2014 Village law, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), pp. 493–507.

Verdiesen, I., Dignum, V. & Van Den Hoven, J. (2018) Measuring moral acceptability in E-deliberation: A practical application of ethics by participation, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 18(4).

Vos, J., Perreault, T. & Boelens, R. (2018) Introduction: Exclusion and struggles for co-decision, In: Boelens, R., Perreault, T. & Vos, J. (eds.) Water Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 71-82.

Wu, Y., Wu, Y., Shang, Y., Guo, H. & Wang, J. (2020) Social network efficiency of multiple stakeholders on agricultural drought risk governance — A southern China case study, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101772.

Yin, R. K. (2018) Case study research: Design and methods (2nd Edition) (New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.).

Young, H. (2017) Busy yet passive: (non-)decision-making in school governing bodies, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(6), pp. 812–826.

Zhang, K. (2019) Encountering Dissimilar Views in Deliberation: Political Knowledge, Attitude Strength, and Opinion Change, Political Psychology, 40(2), pp. 315–333.

Published

2023-11-01

Issue

Section

Article