Personalized Meditation Music Recommendation Based on Emotion Assessment: Application Research in Online Music Education

Authors

  • Lei Dong Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Jl. Udayana No.11, Banjar Tegal, Singaraja, Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali 81116, Indonesia
  • Putu Kerti Nitiasih Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Jl. Udayana No.11, Banjar Tegal, Singaraja, Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali 81116, Indonesia
  • I Gede Budasi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Jl. Udayana No.11, Banjar Tegal, Singaraja, Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali 81116, Indonesia
  • Putu Nanci Riastini Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Jl. Udayana No.11, Banjar Tegal, Singaraja, Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali 81116, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/22.4.36-40(2024)

Keywords:

emotion assessment • personalized music recommendation • online music education • self-regulation • mixed-methods research • digital well-being

Abstract

Background: The rapid transition to online education has created significant challenges in supporting students' emotional well-being, particularly for music education students who require emotional expression and collaborative engagement difficult to replicate in digital environments. Current one-size-fits-all interventions fail to address individual differences in emotional states and learning preferences.Purpose: This study investigates the effectiveness of a personalized meditation music recommendation system based on real-time emotion assessment in online music education, examining its impact on university students' self-regulation capabilities and emotional well-being.Methods: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental design was employed with 72 undergraduate music majors over 8 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to experimental (n=36) and control (n=36) groups. The experimental group received personalized music recommendations through a three-layer mapping system based on daily PANAS-SF assessments, while the control group accessed fixed meditation playlists.Results: The experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in emotion regulation (t=4.23, p<0.001), with self-regulation scores increasing from M=3.42 to M=4.56 (d=1.38). Qualitative analysis revealed themes of emotional validation, enhanced autonomy, and meta-cognitive awareness. 85% of participants reported improved learning focus, with voluntary engagement exceeding minimum requirements by 93%.Conclusion: Personalized meditation music recommendations based on emotion assessment effectively enhance self-regulation and emotional well-being in online music education contexts, offering an accessible, low-cost solution for institutional implementation.

References

Ananiev, J., & Poposka, Z. (2014). Participation and anti-discrimination based local strategic documents - case of macedonian municipalities. Lex Localis - Revija Za Lokalno Samoupravo, 12(3), 575-590.
Anechiarico F. and Jacobs, J. B. (1996) The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Anderson, C. J. & Tverdova Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91-109.
Andersson S. and Heywood P. M. (2009) The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International's Approach to Measuring Corruption." Political Studies 74(4), 746-767.
Armstrong, A., A., and Bernstein, M. (2008) Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movement. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74-99.
Atkinson, M. M. (2011). Discrepancies in perceptions of corruption, or why is Canada so corrupt? Political Science Quarterly, 126(3), 445-464.
Bateson, R. (2012). Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 570-587.
Beeri, I. & Navot, D. (2012). Local political corruption: Potential structural malfunctions at the central-local, local-local and intra-local levels. Public Management Review, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14719037.2012.707682.
Bennett, E. A., Cordner, A. and Klein, P. T., Savell, S. and Baiocchi, G. (2013). Disavowing Politics: Civic Engagement in an Era of Political Skepticism. American Journal of Sociology, 119(2), 518-548.
Berkowitz, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4, 107–130.
Buchan, B. and Hill, L. (2014) An Intellectual History of Political Corruption. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.
Doorn, J. van M. and Zeelenberg and Breugelmans S. M. (2014) Anger and Prosocial Behavior. Emotion Review 6 (3): 261- 268.
van Hensbroek, P. B. (2010). Cultural citizenship as a normative notion for activist practices. Citizenship Studies, 14(3), 317-330.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
Fukuyama, F. (2013) What is Governance? Governance, 26(3), 347-368.
Guldvik, I., Askheim, O. P., & Johansen, V. (2013). Political citizenship and local political participation for disabled people. Citizenship Studies, 17(1), 76-91.
Ikeda, S. (2004). Imperial subjects, national citizenship, and corporate subjects: Cycles of political Participation/Exclusion in the modern world-system. Citizenship Studies, 8(4), 333-347.
Johnston, M. (1991). Right & wrong in british politics: "Fits of morality" in comparative perspective. Polity, 24(1), 1-25.
Johnston, M. (2010) 'Democracy without Politics? Hidden Costs of Corruption and Reform in America' in M. A. Genovese and V. A. Farrer-Myers (eds.), Corruption and American Politics. Amherst, New York: Cambria Press, pp. 9-36.
Johnston, M. (2014). Corruption, Contention and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Julnes, P. d. L. and Villoria, M. (2014) Understanding and addressing citizens’ perceptions of corruption: the case of Spain. International Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 23-43.
Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J. and van Stekelenburg, J. (2008) Embeddedness and Identity: How Immigrants Turn Grievances into Action. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 992-1012.
McManus-Czubinska, C., Miller, W. L., Markowski, R. & Wasilewski, J. (2004) Why is corruption in Poland "a Serious Cause for Concern"? Crime, Law and Social Change, 41, 107-132.
Miller, D. T. (2001) Disrespect and the Experience of Injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–53.
Moreno, A. (2002) Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment. Comparative Sociology, 1(3-4), 495-507.
Morris, S. D. & Blake, C. H. (2010). Corruption & politics in Latin America. In S. D. Morris & C. H. Blake (eds.), Corruption & Politics in Latin America: National and Regional Dynamics (pp.1-28). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Morris, S. D. & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258-1285.
Muldoon, P. (2008) The Moral Legitimacy of Anger. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(3), 299-314.
Neuhouser, F. (2000) Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom.
Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nye J. S. (1967) Corruption and Political Development: A cost-Benefit Analysis.” American Political Science Review, 36(2): 417-427.
Philp, M. (1997). Defining political corruption. Political Studies, XLV, 436-462.
Redlawsk, D. P. & McCann, J. A. (2005). Popular interpretations of ‘corruption’and their partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27(3), 261-283.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978) Corruption: a Study in Political Economy. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of Government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothstein, B. (2014) What is the Opposite of Corruption? Third World Quarterly, 35(5), 737-752.
Scott J. (1972) Comparative Public Corruption. New-Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. and Englewood Cliffs.
Skrbec, J., & Dobovsek, B. (2013). Corruption capture of local self-governments in slovenia. Lex Localis - Revija Za Lokalno Samoupravo, 11(3), 615-630.
Thompson, D., F. (1993) Mediated Corruption: The Case of the Keating Five. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 369-381.
Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law: The bulging pocket makes the easy life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B. and van Dijk, W. W. (2009) Context Matters: Explaining How and Why Mobilizing Context Influences Motivational Dynamics. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 815-838.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in american politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warren M. E. (2004) What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2): 328-343.
Warren, M. E. (2010). Low Trust in Democratic Institutions. In M. A. Genovese, & V. A. Farrar-Myers (Eds.), Corruption and American Politics (pp.37-64). Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
Wroe, A., Allen, N. & Birch, S. (2013). The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption. European Political Science Review, 5(2), 175-195.
Zechmeister, E. & Zizumbo-Colunga, D. (2013). The varying political toll of concerns about corruption in good versus bad economic times. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1190-1218.


Downloads

Published

2024-12-02

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Personalized Meditation Music Recommendation Based on Emotion Assessment: Application Research in Online Music Education. (2024). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 22(4), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.52152/22.4.36-40(2024)