CANON LAW AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL AND THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

This study examines Canon Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) convergence from both legal and theological perspectives. It addresses the unique features of canonical ADR systems, such as mediation and reconciliation, and contrasts them with their secular analogues. Grounded in the theological virtues of justice, mercy, and reconciliation, the study shows how canonical ADR facilitates the pastoral mission of the Church without compromising legal order. Comparative insights from Islamic and Jewish religious systems of dispute resolution enrich the analysis. Case studies and field experience demonstrate the effectiveness and challenges of ADR in Catholic institutions. The paper concludes by resolving tensions in doctrine, civil law integration, and future directions, reaffirming the growing centrality of ADR in promoting ecclesial harmony and justice.