The Constitutional Principles of Economic Governance Policy in Algeria: In light of the 2020 Amendment

Authors

  • Adel Douadi Lecturer Professor Class A, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Setif 2, Algeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/7prmpz57

Keywords:

Constitutional principles; economic governance; freedom of competition; equality; integrity

Abstract

In the context of ongoing efforts to confront the crises afflicting the Algerian national economy, the public authorities have, in successive stages, embarked on economic reform processes aimed at addressing the various imbalances that have emerged at the implementation level. However, as many experts have confirmed, these reforms have not borne fruit. This has made it necessary to engage in serious reflection on formulating and adopting an economic policy characterised by the rational and judicious utilisation of all the economic resources with which the country is endowed and by the valorisation of all national competences without excluding any of them to drive economic growth in a balanced manner throughout the national territory. Since the design and implementation of this policy for the governance of the national economy fall within the remit of the public authorities of the State, it must comply with the provisions of the Constitution, particularly in light of its most recent amendment in 2020, the principles governing the management and regulation of economic affairs. 

References

Alm, J. and D.M. Rath (1998). Tax Policy Analysis: The Introduction of a Russian Tax Amnesty (October 1998). GSU Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Working Paper No. 98-6.
Le Borgne E. (2006). Economic and political determinants of tax amnesties in the U.S. States, IMF WP706/222. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp06222.pdf
Malik, A.S., and R.M. Schwab (1991). The Economics of Tax Amnesties, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 46, pp. 29–49. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(91)90063-8.
On obligatory pension insurance in the Russian Federation: The Federal law of 15 December 2001 no. 167-FZ (2001). Rossiyskaya Gazeta, no. 247.
On the Procedure of applying certain provisions of the Federal law of 30 December (2006) no. 69-FZ ‘on simplified procedure for declaring income of individuals’: Letter from the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, the federal Treasury, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation № 03-04-08-01/7 from 20 February 2007, 2007.
Act No. 269-FZ (2006) On the simplified order for declaring income of individuals: The Federal law of 30 December 2006 no. 269-FZ, 2006. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, No. 297.
Russia – The Tax Amnesty Bill approved by the President (2007). Ernst and Young: HR and Tax Alert. www.ey.com/RU/ru/Services/Tax/Tax_Tax-Brief-archive.
Stella, P. (1991). An economic analysis of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46: 383–400. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(91)90013-R
Tax amnesty will not be repeated (editorial) (2007). New times, No. 2.
The budget code of the Russian Federation of 31.07.1998 # 145-FZ (1998), Rossiyskaya Gazeta, no. 153-154, 1998.
The Penal code of the Russian Federation from 13/06/1996 No. 63-FZ (1996. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, No. 113, No. 114, 18/06/1996 19/06/1996, No. 115, 20/06/1996, No. 118, 25/06/1996.
The tax code of the Russian Federation (part II) of the Federal Act of August 5, 2000 No. 117-FZ (amended) (2000). Code of laws of the Russian Federation, No. 32, Art. 3340.
Torgler B., Schaltegger, C.A. (2005). Tax amnesties and political participation, Public Finance Rev., 33: 403-431. DOI: 10.1177/1091142105275438
Trust in the State (2007). Russian tax courier, No. 6.
Zolotov, A., Kogan, B. (2007). Amnesty for the Tax service and not the Bank, PE Attorney, No. 2.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-05

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

The Constitutional Principles of Economic Governance Policy in Algeria: In light of the 2020 Amendment. (2025). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(10), 1673-1699. https://doi.org/10.52152/7prmpz57